<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>phenology &#8211; Ecologist Goes to Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="/egwash/tag/phenology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/egwash</link>
	<description>The Ecologist Goes to Washington features the stories and reflections of scientists who have engaged their local, state, or federal governments in addressing the broader implications of their research.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Picture Your Grant on the Hannity Show: David Inouye on why basic research isn’t a bridge to nowhere</title>
		<link>/egwash/picture-your-grant-on-the-hannity-show-david-inouye-on-why-basic-research-isn%e2%80%99t-a-bridge-to-nowhere/</link>
					<comments>/egwash/picture-your-grant-on-the-hannity-show-david-inouye-on-why-basic-research-isn%e2%80%99t-a-bridge-to-nowhere/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[terence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[The Ecologist Goes to Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science funding]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/egwash/?p=154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[David Inouye on having his NSF grant singled out as wasteful spending by Senators Coburn and McCain and political commentator Sean Hannity. <span class="read-more"><a href="/egwash/picture-your-grant-on-the-hannity-show-david-inouye-on-why-basic-research-isn%e2%80%99t-a-bridge-to-nowhere/">Read more &#8250;</a></span>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="width: 214px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" title="David Inouye" src="http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/experts/portraits/106593086.jpg" alt="photo: umd.edu" width="204" height="173" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo:University of Maryland</p></div>
<p>Senators Coburn and McCain recently released a report on wasteful stimulus package spending, pointing to several NSF-funded studies, including ecologist David Inouye’s research on the response of alpine wildflowers to climate change. Here, Inouye discusses the experience of having his work singled out in the report—and subsequently on the Sean Hannity show—and explains how basic research is indeed a public investment. For more information, see the accompanying <a href="../../esablog/ecology-in-policy/picture-your-grant-on-the-hannity-show-david-inouye-on-why-basic-research-isn%E2%80%99t-a-bridge-to-nowhere/">post</a> on ESA’s blog <em>Ecotone.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/egwash/picture-your-grant-on-the-hannity-show-david-inouye-on-why-basic-research-isn%e2%80%99t-a-bridge-to-nowhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
