{"id":13989,"date":"2018-04-23T16:58:53","date_gmt":"2018-04-23T20:58:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=13989"},"modified":"2018-04-23T16:58:53","modified_gmt":"2018-04-23T20:58:53","slug":"april-23-2018-policy-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/2018\/04\/23\/april-23-2018-policy-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Policy News: April 23, 2018"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>ESA Policy News<\/strong><\/h1>\n<h1 style=\"text-align: center\">In This Issue:<\/h1>\n<p><a href=\"#gspaday\"><strong>2018 Graduate Student Policy Award Hill Day<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ten graduate students visit Washington, DC to meet with their members of Congress and advocate for science funding.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"#farmbill\">Farm Bill Advances<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Farm bill moves out of House Committee.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#ballast\"><strong>Ballast Discharge Bill Fails<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell attempted to include a provision on ballast water in unrelated legislation.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"#quickreads\">Quick Reads<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>New NASA Administrator, White House Energy and Environment Adviser resigns and more.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#getinvolved\"><strong>Get Involved<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Opportunities to provide nominations for scientific advisory committees, provide input on CITES, and other comments.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#legupdates\"><strong>Legislative Updates<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Listing of recently introduced and passed relevant legislation.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"#fedreg\">Federal Register Opportunities<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Upcoming meetings and other opportunities for public involvement<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"#vote\">Register to Vote<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>2018 midterm elections are happening in November.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rockthevote.org\/voting-information\/\">Register to vote and learn more about voting policies and rights in your state at Rock the Vote.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"#news\">ESA In the News<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>View an up-to-date list of ESA\u2019s media coverage<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"#letters\">ESA Correspondence to Policymakers<\/a><\/strong><br>\n<a id=\"gspaday\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>2018 Graduate Student Award Policy Hill Day<\/h2>\n<p>Ten Katherine S. McCarter Graduate Student Policy Award (GSPA) recipients traveled to Washington, DC April 10 and 11 to learn about the legislative and budget process and to meet with their Members of Congress. They arrived in DC just as the famous cherry blossoms were in full bloom. This year\u2019s award recipients are\u00a0<strong>Aaron W. Baumgardner<\/strong>\u00a0(California State University, Bakersfield),\u00a0<strong>Stephen R. Elser<\/strong>\u00a0(Arizona State University),\u00a0<strong>Ann Marie Gawel<\/strong>\u00a0(Iowa State University),\u00a0<strong>Emily E. Graves<\/strong>\u00a0(University of California, Davis),\u00a0<strong>Chelsea L. Merriman<\/strong>\u00a0(Boise State University),\u00a0S<strong>teffanie M. Mungu\u00eda<\/strong>\u00a0(Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey),\u00a0<strong>Vera W. Pfeiffer\u00a0<\/strong>(University of Wisconsin-Madison),<strong>\u00a0Johnny J. Quisp<\/strong>e\u00a0(Rutgers University),\u00a0<strong>Urooj S. Raja<\/strong>\u00a0(University of Colorado Boulder), and\u00a0<strong>Jenna M. Sullivan<\/strong>\u00a0(Oregon State University).<\/p>\n<p>After a day of training April 10, the students stormed the Hill April 11 and met with over 30 congressional offices to request $8.45 billion in federal funding for the National Science Foundation in Fiscal Year (FY) 2019. Congress is in the beginning stages of developing the FY19 federal budget, so these visits were timely. The students highlighted during the meetings how federal investments in the ecological sciences benefit the communities that the lawmakers represent. It was a particularly busy day on the Hill April 11 due to press and protesters on the Hill to see Mark Zuckerberg\u2019s appearance in front of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. And, the cherry on the cake, was that House Speaker Paul Ryan announced he would not seek reelection on that same day. Electricity seemed to crackle through the air as staffers nervously checked their phones and Twitter accounts for any other breaking news. As one staffer put it, \u201cYou know you are in for a busy day when four news cycles have passed by 10:00 am.\u201d\u00a0 The students got to see the Washington fishbowl up close and in action.<\/p>\n<p>After brief introductions April 10 in the ESA office, the group headed out and navigated the DC Metro subway system to hear a keynote from Tobin Smith, vice president for policy at the American Association of Universities. Smith drew from his career working on Capitol Hill and in science policy to give the students context on how Capitol Hill works and how the federal government funds scientific research using the popular analogy of comparing the political process to a sausage factory.<\/p>\n<p>Later that morning, the graduate students heard from ESA members working in policy-related positions in Washington, DC about career options for ecologists. Speakers included Brittany West Marsden (integration analyst, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and GSPA alumni), Alexis Erwin (senior environmental advisor, U.S. Agency for International Development and GSPA alumni), ESA President Rich Pouyat (retired, U.S. Forest Service) and Susan Norton (research ecologist, Environmental Protection Agency). Pouyat shared his experience of catching \u201cPotomac Fever\u201d while working as AAAS Fellow on the Hill and getting hooked on working in policy. ESA Executive Director Catherine O\u2019Riordan also joined the group and provided perspective on science policy careers in nonprofits. In the afternoon, GSPA participants received further training from staff on the federal budget and how to effectively communicate with Congress.<\/p>\n<p>During the Hill meetings,\u00a0the GSPA participants shared personal stories of how federal funding makes their research possible, emphasized the importance of federal funding for their institutions, and described how federal investments in scientific research benefit the Members of Congress\u2019 districts. Students lucked-out this year and met, or snapped pictures, with Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID), Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA), Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Del. Madeleine Bordallo (D-Guam). Congressional offices were mostly supportive of science funding, and the participants\u2019 messages were well-received. We look forward to seeing how the GSPA experience shapes their future career choices.<\/p>\n<p>See pictures from the GSPA Days on Flickr\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ecologicalsocietyofamerica\/sets\/72157690019072810\/with\/39734141700\/\">here<\/a>.<br>\n<a id=\"farmbill\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Farm Bill Advances<\/h2>\n<p>The Agriculture and Nutrition Act of 2018 (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/house-bill\/2?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22congressId%3A115+AND+billStatus%3A%5C%22Introduced%5C%22%22%5D%7D&amp;r=24\">H.R.2<\/a>), also known as the Farm Bill, was introduced in the House of Representatives April 12 by Representative Michael Conaway (R-TX), chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture. Typically attracting some measure of bi-partisan support, this year\u2019s Farm Bill advanced out of committee April 18 by a party-line vote of 26-20.<\/p>\n<p>Partisan division over Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) could derail the entire bill, forcing the continuation of the 2014 Farm Bill that is set to expire September 30, according to Representative Jim Costa (D-CA), ranking member on the Livestock and Foreign Agriculture Subcommittee. The 2018 Farm Bill would mandate more stringent work requirements for those receiving aid from SNAP, which represents approximately 80 percent of spending authorizations under the Farm Bill and is the largest program in the domestic hunger safety net. The proposed new work requirements could remove 2 million Americans from the program.<\/p>\n<p>Environmental issues of concern in the Farm Bill include a proposal that would double the acreage for forest-thinning projects receiving a National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) categorical exclusion from 3,000 acres to 6,000 acres. The forest thinning provisions would enable the Agriculture Department, which manages national forests, to bypass consultations with the Fish and Wildlife Service or the NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service if the Agriculture secretary \u201cdetermines that such forest management activity is not likely to adversely effect \u201d species and habitats protected by the Endangered Species Act.\u00a0\u00a0It would also limit any requested consultations to 90 days.<\/p>\n<p>The Conservation Reserve Program, which pays enrolled farmers a yearly rent to remove environmentally sensitive land from agricultural production and to plant beneficial species, would increase maximum enrollments from 24 million acres to 30 million, but come with lower payments, discouraging participation.\u00a0Senate Agriculture Chairman Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS) said, \u201cThere\u2019s a lot of support for increasing that (the CRP acreage cap), and there\u2019s some pushback,\u201d in comments appearing in Agri-Pulse. \u201cIt\u2019s very expensive,\u201d he added.\u00a0Grain companies are opposed to expanded set-asides and reduced crop production worries farm communities.<\/p>\n<p>The Conservation Stewardship Program, the largest conservation program in the U.S., which provides agricultural and forest producers for \u201coperations-level\u201d conservation impacts, would be eliminated, with some functions being folded into the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nrcs.usda.gov\/wps\/portal\/nrcs\/main\/national\/programs\/financial\/eqip\/\">Environmental Quality Incentives Program<\/a>. Representative Marsha Fudge (D-OH) objects because the two programs have different objectives and should remain distinct programs.<\/p>\n<p>Senate Democrats on the Environment and Public Works Committee sent an April 16 letter to Senate Agriculture leadership warning that \u201cpolarizing and controversial environment policy riders \u2026 will unduly harm efficiency and expeditious consideration and approval of the Farm Bill by the full Senate.\u201d<br>\n<a id=\"ballast\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Ballast Discharge Bill Fails<\/h2>\n<p>A series of complex legislative maneuvers by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) attempted to advance the \u201cCoast Guard Authorization Act\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/senate-bill\/1129\">S.1129<\/a>) which incorporates controversial ballast water provisions from \u201cCommercial Vessel Incidental Discharge Act\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/senate-bill\/168\">S.168<\/a>), also known as VIDA, by attaching it to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/senate-bill\/140\">S.140<\/a>, a bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act (WMAT Act).<\/p>\n<p>It is a common tactic to attach unrelated legislation into a larger bill that may be easier to pass. However, the effort failed April 19 by a split vote of 56-42 when three co-sponsors of VIDA, Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Brian Schatz (D-HI) and Chris Coons (D-DE), voted no. Sean Coit, speaking for Sen. Coons, said that the senator \u201cremains supportive of the policies outlined in VIDA and voted no to let his colleagues [from the Great Lakes region] continue negotiations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Some lawmakers from the Great Lakes states contend that the VIDA discharge language would exempt commercial shipping from provisions of the Clean Water Act, in particular leaving those waters vulnerable to aquatic invasive species, such as the zebra mussel, costing industry and communities millions of dollars annually.<\/p>\n<p>Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), commented on the Senate floor, said, \u201cIt exempts ships in the Great Lakes from meeting the best available control standards required everywhere else.\u201d Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), also speaking on the floor, said, \u201cZebra mussels were only in the lower Great Lakes, and then they moved all the way up to Lake Superior because of these vessels, so it does make a difference having those standards.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Stabenow and Durbin are both concerned that the VIDA provisions could prevent states from regulating pollutant chemicals in ballast discharges.<\/p>\n<p>Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel tweeted, \u201cThis legislation is dangerous, destructive and detrimental to all of us who rely on the Great Lakes for our drinking water, our economy and our way of life.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Senator Gary Peters (D-MI) strongly opposes VIDA\u2019s ballast language, though he said \u201cI think \u2026 there is a way to find some middle ground there,\u201d in comments also quoted in the same\u00a0E&amp;E Daily\u00a0article.<\/p>\n<p>A motion to reconsider\u00a0S.140, by Majority Leader McConnell, which would return it to the Senate floor, is pending, but timing is uncertain.<br>\n<a id=\"quickreads\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Quick Reads<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Mick Mulvaney Proceeding With Vast Federal Budget Cuts\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney\u00a0has stated\u00a0that the White House budget plan\u2019s deep spending cuts will be moving forward and may even\u00a0be split\u00a0across multiple proposals. He outlined a vague plan at a House Financial Services Appropriations Subcommittee hearing to introduce proposals \u201ca month from now [and] some later on in the fall.\u201d Mulvaney did not specify what areas would\u00a0be targeted\u00a0for budget cuts. There is fear that these remarks could point to an attempt to reverse crucial spending increases for fiscal year 2018 that Congress approved in a bipartisan deal earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>Under a 1974 budget law, the president has the authority to propose budget rescission to Congress, but Congress must approve these recessions\u00a0for them to go into effect. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has stated he would not approve of rolling back the recent omnibus spending measure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trump Picks News Energy &amp; Climate Adviser<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>President Trump\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2018-03-25\/trump-said-to-name-energy-department-official-as-top-energy-aide\">selected Wells Griffith<\/a>\u00a0to oversee international energy and climate strategy at the White House National Economic Council. Griffith worked on Trump\u2019s presidential campaign and served on the administration\u2019s transition team. For the past year, he served as the principal deputy acting secretary for international affairs at the Department of Energy, which was his first professional experience in the energy and environmental field. Colleagues describe Griffith as loyal to Trump, a good listener and a quick learner. Landon Derentz, a career civil servant from the State Department who previously worked at Energy,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.eenews.net\/stories\/1060077571\">will join Griffith<\/a>\u00a0at the National Economic Council. While at State,\u00a0Derentz\u00a0worked on global energy markets and liquefied natural gas issues. Both Griffith and\u00a0Darentzappointments are on a temporary three months, but their positions may become permanent.<\/p>\n<p><strong>New Jersey Legislature Approves Offshore Drilling Ban<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The New Jersey State Legislature\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.njherald.com\/article\/20180412\/AP\/304129688\">voted to approve a measure to ban offshore drilling in state waters<\/a>. The bill also requires the federal government to coordinate with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection before allowing development in federal waters adjacent to state waters and bans oil and gas pipelines in New Jersey waters. Lawmakers passed the bill in direct response to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke\u2019s plan to open federal waters to offshore drilling.<\/p>\n<p><strong>District Court Strikes down Climate Analysis in BLM Leasing Plans<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The U.S. District Court in Montana\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/insideclimatenews.org\/news\/26032018\/coal-mining-climate-impacts-powder-river-basin-fossil-fuels-wyoming-montana-blm-nepa-ruling\">ruled<\/a>\u00a0that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) did not adequately account for\u00a0climate change\u00a0in developing its resource management plans for the Power River Basin area in Wyoming and Montana. The court ruling forces the BLM to revise some of its National Environmental Policy Act reviews. Under the ruling, BLM is required to calculate greenhouse gas emissions resulting from oil, gas and coal development allowed in the management plans.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Forest Service Revises Public Comment Process<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Forest Service (FS) announced March 30 that the agency\u00a0will\u00a0revise how and when it will ask the public to comment. A final rule published in the Federal Register explains that, under current regulations, the FS only asks for public comment for directives published in the Forest Service Manual. Directives in the Forest Service manual give staff guidance on topics like livestock grazing permits and habitat management.\u00a0Guidance in the Forest Service handbook compliments these directives and provides more detailed instructions to staff. The new rule will require the Forest Service to open most guidance and directives published in both the Forest Service handbook and the Forest Service Manual\u00a0for\u00a0public comment. The FS will also allow the public to submit comments on these directives through the internet. Comments on this rule can be submitted\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cara.ecosystem-management.org\/Public\/CommentInput?project=ORMS-1893\">online<\/a>\u00a0through May 29, 2018.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Court Rejects Mexican Wolf Rule<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The U.S. District Court in Arizona\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.abqjournal.com\/1154234\/court-remands-wolf-rule-to-feds.html\">struck down<\/a>\u00a0a 2015 Fish and Wildlife Service rule for managing Mexican gray wolves April 2, stating that the rule did not adequately ensure the species\u2019 persistence in the long term. The rule capped the population of red wolves in Arizona and New Mexico at 325 individuals and prohibited wolves from entering the northern portions of the states, including Grand Canyon National Park. Judge Jennifer Zipps noted that the Fish and Wildlife Service ignored the advice of scientists who expressed concerns over the population cap and misinterpreted these same scientists\u2019 findings to support their decision.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fish and Wildlife Service Lists Yellow Lance Freshwater Mussels as Threatened<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Fish and Wildlife Service\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/03\/2018-06735\/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-threatened-species-status-for-yellow-lance\">listed<\/a>\u00a0yellow lance freshwater mussel as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act\u00a0in\u00a0April. The yellow lance\u00a0is native to\u00a0Maryland, Virginia and North Carolina.\u00a0Threats\u00a0to yellow lance\u00a0mussels\u00a0include invasive species, dams, agricultural activities and urban development in its range. The yellow lance\u00a0was first listed\u00a0as an Endangered Species Act candidate species in 1991, but the Fish and Wildlife Service did not list the species. In 2011, the agency admitted that \u201clisting may be warranted\u201d for the species and lawsuits from the Center for Biological Diversity forced the agency to make a final decision.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Kirtland\u2019s Warbler Removed from Endangered Species List<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Fish and Wildlife Service\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/12\/2018-06864\/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-removing-the-kirtlands-warbler-from-the-federal-list\">proposed<\/a>\u00a0removing the Kirtland\u2019s warbler from the threatened and endangered species list April 12. The birds have experienced a dramatic recovery \u2014 more than 2,300 singing male Kirtland\u2019s warblers were counted in a 2015 census, about 10 times more than were recorded in the 1980s. Kirtland\u2019s warblers have been considered endangered since before the passing of the Endangered Species Act in 1973. Comments on the proposed rule are due July 11, 2018.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NOAA Publishes List of Foreign Fisheries<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration\u00a0has\u00a0finalized its first \u2018<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fisheries.noaa.gov\/foreign\/international-affairs\/list-foreign-fisheries\">List of Foreign Fisheries<\/a>\u2018. This list, required by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, describes the risks that commercial fisheries in 135 countries pose to marine mammals. Now, these fisheries have until 2022 to prove their operations do not pose a significant risk to marine mammals or use equivalent methods to similar fisheries in the U.S.\u00a0to\u00a0continue to export fish and fish products into the U.S.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mixed Court Rulings on Dams and Impacts to Fish<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.eenews.net\/eenewspm\/2018\/04\/02\/stories\/1060077953\">ruled April 2<\/a>\u00a0the Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation must allow more water to flow over dams in the Columbia River Basin to allow threatened salmon species to migrate in the spring.\u00a0This\u00a0ruling is the fourth time that courts have required federal dam managers to increase water flows in the Columbia and Snake Rivers\u00a0to\u00a0protect fish species. The same week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals also\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.columbian.com\/news\/2018\/apr\/04\/court-lifts-block-on-montana-dam-in-dispute-over-endangered-fish\/?utm_source=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=14636\">ruled<\/a>\u00a0to allow construction to begin on a dam project on the Yellowstone River in Montana, despite claims from the Defenders of Wildlife that the dam would harm endangered pallid sturgeons.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Funding for International Climate Programs<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The fiscal year 2018 omnibus spending bill provides 3 million dollars for the State Department to pay dues to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The U.S. usually contributes 10 million annually,\u00a0but\u00a0the State Department has not provided any funding for the organizations since Trump\u00a0was inaugurated. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) negotiated the increase of a line item from seven to ten million in funding for \u201cU.N. Environment Programs.\u201d It\u2019s unlikely that the State Department will transfer these funds to the U.N. until a permanent secretary of state is in place. If confirmed, Secretary of State Nominee Mike Pompeo may block transferring these funds to U.N. climate change programs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Bureau of Land Management Headquarters May Move West<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Deputy Interior Secretary David Bernhardt\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.gjsentinel.com\/news\/western_colorado\/interior-s-second-in-command-blm-to-leave-washington\/article_5522ee70-3a23-11e8-ab61-10604b9ffe60.html?wpisrc=nl_energy202&amp;wpmm=1\">told a crowd<\/a>\u00a0of Colorado officials that the Bureau of Land Management headquarters\u00a0will\u00a0be moving out of Washington, D.C. The\u00a0agency\u2019s\u00a0new headquarters will be closer\u00a0to federal lands managed by the agency.\u00a0Bernhardt\u00a0made the announcement\u00a0at an event at Colorado Mesa University, sparking speculation that the agency\u2019s new headquarters may be in Colorado. Both Rep. Scott Tipton (R-CO) and Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) have introduced bills to move the BLM headquarters to a Western state. The move will be a part of Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke\u2019s larger effort to reorganize the Interior Department. Zinke\u2019s reorganization plan is unpopular with Congress. The 2018 omnibus spending bill included a provision that prohibited federal agencies from making major reorganization plans without consulting Congress.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Preble\u2019s Jumping Mouse Retains Endangered Species Protections<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.denverpost.com\/2018\/04\/16\/prebles-jumping-mouse-remain-protected-list\/\">rejected<\/a>\u00a0a petition to remove the Preble\u2019s meadow jumping mouse from the federal endangered species list April 16. The petition, filed by the conservative Pacific Legal Foundation on behalf of some Western ranching and home-building organizations, primarily argued that the mouse is not a\u00a0distinct\u00a0subspecies and when it is considered part of a larger species it is no longer threatened. The agency countered that this argument did not provide sufficient new information that would support a taxonomic revision of the Preble\u2019s mouse.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Florida Youth Sue Governor Rick Scott Over Climate Change<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A group of eight Florida residents between the ages of 10 and 20 \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.miamiherald.com\/news\/local\/environment\/article208967284.html?wpisrc=nl_energy202&amp;wpmm=1\">sued<\/a>Governor Rick Scott (R-FL) for ignoring the climate threat and called for a science-based \u201cClimate Recovery Plan.\u201d\u00a0The organization sponsoring the lawsuit, The Children\u2019s Trust, argues that Florida has violated the public trust by failing to protect certain essential natural resources. A representative for Governor Scott stated that the governor signed an environmental protection budget last month, demonstrating his commitment to environmental issues despite his record of questioning climate change and supporting President Trump\u2019s decision to leave the Paris climate agreement. In related news, the\u00a0Juliana vs United States\u00a0case, in which the Children\u2019s Trust\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.climateliabilitynews.org\/2018\/04\/12\/youth-climate-case-juliana-v-us-ann-aiken\/\">sued<\/a>\u00a0the federal government for failing to act on climate change on behalf of 21 young people, will be heard by a federal judge in October 2018.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bridenstine Confirmed as NASA Administrator<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Senate\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/04\/19\/science\/jim-bridenstine-nasa.html\">voted to confirmed<\/a>\u00a0Trump nominee Jim Bridenstine\u00a0for NASA Administrator\u00a0on April 21. The vote fell on sharp party lines \u2013 50 Democrats voted for Bridenstine while 47 Democrats and two independents voted against Bridenstine\u2019s confirmation. Senate Democrats, led by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) opposed the nomination citing Bridenstine\u2019s denial of climate change science and his lack of scientific credentials. Until his confirmation as NASA Administrator, Bridenstine served in the House of Representatives as a congressman from Oklahoma. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) previously expressed concerns about Bridenstine\u2019s nomination, but he ultimately voted to confirm.<\/p>\n<p><b>Trump\u2019s Top Energy Adviser\u00a0leaves the White House\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Mike Catanzaro, President Trump\u2019s top energy and environmental adviser, is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2018-04-17\/white-house-energy-aide-catanzaro-will-return-to-lobbying-firm\">leaving<\/a>\u00a0the White House.\u00a0Cantanzaro\u00a0has been the chief White House staffer on domestic energy and environmental policy since February 2017 and is expected to step down the week of April 23 to rejoin the lobbying firm he worked for before joining the administration. During his time at the White\u00a0House,\u00a0he was instrumental in crafting Trump\u2019s energy policies and rolling back Obama administration environmental rules including the Clean Power Plan and Obama\u2019s signature water rule. The lobbying firm, CGCN, said in a statement that Catanzaro will follow all applicable ethics requirement. Catanzaro will\u00a0be replaced\u00a0by Francis Brooke, a policy adviser for Vice President Mike Pence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lesser Long-Nosed Bat Removed from Endangered Species List<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced April 17 that the lesser long-nosed bat\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/18\/2018-08121\/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-removal-of-the-lesser-long-nosed-bat-from-the-federal\">removed<\/a>\u00a0from the list of endangered species protected under the Endangered Species Act. The bat was listed in 1988 when its population was dangerously close to potential extinction. Today, it has a population estimated to be upward of 200,000. The lesser long-nosed bat is known for pollinating Mexican agave plants which\u00a0are used\u00a0for tequila production. Conservation groups largely applauded the decision and the species\u2019 successful recovery.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trump Administration Defends Atlantic Marine National Monument<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration\u00a0moved to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/6a7317a0b61a4a50b787dfbd862dbdff\/Trump-administration-defends-Obama%27s-Atlantic-monument?wpisrc=nl_energy202&amp;wpmm=1\">dismiss a lawsuit<\/a>\u00a0by New England\u00a0fishermen\u00a0challenging former President Barack Obama\u2019s decision to designate the nation\u2019s first marine monument in the Atlantic Ocean April 16. The Justice Department argued in a\u00a0court filing\u00a0that Obama did not violate the Antiquities Act in creating the monument which removes nearly 5,000 square miles from oil and gas exploration as well as restricting commercial fishing in the area. This motion comes as the Trump administration faces several lawsuits by green groups, companies, and tribes over its decision removes lands from the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments in Utah.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NOAA will let Gulf Coast States Manage Red Snapper Fishing Seasons<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration\u00a0has\u00a0announced it will\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.eenews.net\/greenwire\/stories\/1060079437\/search?keyword=red+snapper\">allow<\/a>\u00a0five Gulf Coast states to set their fishing seasons for red snapper in federal waters in 2018 and 2019. States plan to take advantage of the move \u2014 Florida is planning for a 40 day recreational fishing season and Alabama planning a 47-day season. Recreational fishing groups \u2013 who have pushed for longer fishing seasons for red snapper \u2014 praised the decision. Conservation groups like the Ocean Conservancy and the Environmental Defense Fund have expressed concerns that last year\u2019s 42\u00a0day\u00a0red snapper season caused overfishing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>EPA\u2019s Science Advisory Board Will Meet\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A key Environmental Protection Agency advisory panel, the Science Advisory Board (SAB), scheduled its\u00a0first face-to-face meeting\u00a0since EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt imposed\u00a0a new membership requirements\u00a0for the board, banning recipients of EPA grants from serving on the board. A half-dozen members of the board were forced out as a result. Many of the replacements have ties to the industries the EPA is meant to regulate. Traditionally, the SAB had consisted mostly of academic researchers. The meeting is set to take place May 31\u00a0and\u00a0June 1 and the agenda includes a discussion of EPA\u2019s semiannual regulatory agenda, briefings by staffers, and a review of a draft report on screening methodologies used in the reviews of hazardous pollutant emissions standards for dozens of industries. The meeting is also expected to elucidate how the group\u2019s direction has changed since Pruitt reshaped it. The meeting will take place in Washington, DC and will be open to the public. For more information, see the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/18\/2018-08135\/notification-of-a-public-meeting-of-the-chartered-science-advisory-board\">Federal Register Notice.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Interior Department will not Reduce Royalty Rates<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/energy-environment\/383564-interior-wont-drop-offshore-royalty-rates?utm_source=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=14969\">will not accept<\/a>\u00a0an internal recommendation to slash\u00a0deep water\u00a0royalty rates by a third. The proposal, which received bipartisan scrutiny, would have cut rates from 18.75 percent to 12.5 percent on acreage more than 200 meters below the ocean\u2019s surface. Zinke stated\u00a0that\u00a0\u201cRight now, we can maintain higher royalties from our offshore waters without compromising the record production and record exports our nation is experiencing.\u201d However, Interior will move forward with other recommendations from the royalty committee, such as conducting a study comparing the U.S. offshore industry to operations in Guyana and Mexico.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hearing on R&amp;D Espionage<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The House Committee on Science held a joint subcommittee hearing looking into the efforts of foreign powers to exploit or steal research and development conducted at academic institutions in the United States on April 11. The committee came to a bipartisan conclusion that such espionage efforts were serious concerns and that countermeasures should\u00a0be strengthened. Despite the strengthened security, legislators affirmed a U.S. commitment to an open research community and a welcoming attitude toward international scholars. Learn more or view the full hearing\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/science.house.gov\/legislation\/hearings\/subcommittee-oversight-and-subcommittee-research-and-technology-hearing\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sage Grouse Plan Leaked\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.eenews.net\/assets\/2018\/04\/16\/document_gw_02.pdf\">leaked draft Environmental Impact Statement<\/a>\u00a0shows that the Bureau of Land Management is planning to\u00a0remove\u00a0some key protections from Obama-era greater\u00a0sage-grouse\u00a0conservation plans in Wyoming, including easing restrictions on oil and gas development and expanding some permitting exemptions. The BLM\u2019s plans for sage grouse in Wyoming are particularly significant because the state contains over one-third of the sage grouse\u2019s total population, the densest population of any state. It is not clear if the agency is drafting similar environmental impact statements in the other nine western states in the sage grouse\u2019s range.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trumps Picks Former State Forester for USDA Undersecretary Position<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>President Trump\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.feedstuffs.com\/news\/hubbard-named-lead-usda-forest-service\">has selected<\/a>\u00a0James Hubbard to serve as the U.S. Department of Agriculture undersecretary for natural resources and environment. This position is responsible for overseeing the U.S. Forest Service and requires Senate confirmation. Hubbard served as the head of the Colorado Forest Service for 20 years and also worked for the U.S. Forest Service as the deputy chief for state and private forestry and the Department of the Interior. Hubbard retired from the U.S. Forest Service in January 2017.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lawmakers Call for Pruitt\u2019s Resignation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/senate-resolution\/473\/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22pruitt%22%5D%7D&amp;r=1\">Thirty-nine senators<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/house-resolution\/834?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22pruitt%22%5D%7D&amp;r=2\">135 representatives<\/a>\u00a0co-sponsored a resolution calling on EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to resign. All of the sponsors are Democrats. The resolution cites Pruitt\u2019s misuse of taxpayer money and his efforts to undermine and censor scientists in agency decision-making.<\/p>\n<p><strong>National Academies of Science Annual Meeting<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The National Academies of Science will hold its 155th annual meeting April 28 through May 1 in Washington, DC.\u00a0 New Academy members will be elected and six members elected to the Academy in 2017 will present thier research. Parts of the meeting will be webcast. For more information, see the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www8.nationalacademies.org\/onpinews\/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=04202018&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=FYI&amp;dm_i=1ZJN,5LK81,MH9NOX,LR2RZ,1\">NAS website<\/a>.<br>\n<a id=\"getinvolved\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Get Involved<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Recommend Members\u00a0for\u00a0NSF Directorate and Office Advisory Committees<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The National Science Foundation is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2018-05262\">requesting recommendations for membership<\/a>\u00a0on its scientific and technical federal advisory committees, including the Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences. These external advisory committees provide advice on program management, discuss current issues, and review and provide advice on the impact of policies, programs, and activities of the directorate or office of NSF.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/12\/2018-07625\/2018-call-for-nominations-north-slope-science-initiative-science-technical-advisory-panel-alaska\">Nominate Members for the North Slope Science Initiative, Science Technical Advisory Panel\u00a0<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Bureau of Land Management is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/12\/2018-07625\/2018-call-for-nominations-north-slope-science-initiative-science-technical-advisory-panel-alaska\">requesting nominations<\/a>\u00a0to serve on the North Slope Science Initiative\u2019s (NSSI) 15-member Science Technical Advisory Panel (Panel). The Panel advises the NSSI Oversight Group on technical issues such as identifying and prioritizing inventory, monitoring, and research needs across the North Slope of Alaska and the adjacent marine environment. Nominations and applications for membership on the panel must be received no later than May 29, 2018.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nominate Members for the Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Bureau of Land Management is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/11\/2018-07463\/call-for-nominations-for-the-national-wild-horse-and-burro-advisory-board\">requesting nominations<\/a>\u00a0of individuals to the Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board. The Board provides advice concerning the management, protection, and control of wild free-roaming horses and burros on public lands administered by the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture, through the U.S. Forest Service. Nominations must\u00a0be submitted\u00a0via mail or email by May 29, 2018.<\/p>\n<p>For more opportunities to get involved, go to the\u00a0<a href=\"#federalreg\">Federal Register<\/a>\u00a0section.<br>\n<a id=\"legupdates\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Legislative Updates<\/h2>\n<p><strong>House Passes Four Natural Resources Bills<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The House of Representatives voted to pass four natural resource-related bills.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/115\/bills\/hr3607\/BILLS-115hr3607ih.pdf\">H.R. 3607<\/a>, introduced by Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA), allows the National Park Service to retain money received for medical services performed at national parks in remote areas.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/115\/bills\/hr3961\/BILLS-115hr3961ih.pdf\">H.R. 3961<\/a>\u00a0from Rep. Darren Soto (R-FL) allows the federal government to initiate a study to consider designating parts of the Kissimmee River as wild and scenic rivers.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/docs.house.gov\/billsthisweek\/20180416\/HR146.pdf\">H.R. 146<\/a>, introduced by Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN), transfers some federal lands in Tennessee to the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/naturalresources.house.gov\/uploadedfiles\/hr_443.pdf\">H.R. 443<\/a>\u00a0from Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-TN) directs the Department of the Interior to study the President James K. Polk Home in Tennessee for inclusion in the National Park System<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>House Natural Resources Committee Advances Several Bills<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The House Natural Resources committee advanced several bills to the full House by voice vote April 18.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The Recreation, Not Rep Tape Act (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/house-bill\/3400?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%223400%2C%22%5D%7D&amp;r=1\">H.R. 3400<\/a>), introduced by Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT) eases permitting for tour guides and tour trips across multiple public land agencies.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/naturalresources.house.gov\/uploadedfiles\/hr__2991.pdf\">H.R. 2991<\/a>, from Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-PA), to establish the Susquehanna National Heritage Area in Pennsylvania.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/naturalresources.house.gov\/uploadedfiles\/hr_788.pdf\">H.R. 788<\/a>, from Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), to amend the Pittman-Robertson Act to facilitate the establishment of more public target ranges in certain states.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/naturalresources.house.gov\/uploadedfiles\/hr_1026.pdf\">H.R. 1026<\/a>, from Rep. Rick Nolan (D-MN), to revise the authorized route of the North Country National Scenic Trail in northeastern Minnesota and to extend the trail in Vermont to connect with the Appalachian National Scenic Trail.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/house-bill\/4069?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%224069%22%5D%7D&amp;r=1\">H.R. 4069<\/a>, from Rep. Don Young (R-AK), to amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to clarify the treatment of authentic Alaska Native articles of handicraft containing nonedible migratory bird parts.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/naturalresources.house.gov\/uploadedfiles\/hr_4645.pdf\">H.R. 4645<\/a>, from Rep. Greg Gianforte (R-MT), to add certain segments of East Rosebud Creek in Montana to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Legislation Introduced<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Invasive Species Prevention and Forest Restoration Act (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/house-bill\/5519?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%225519%22%5D%7D&amp;r=1\">H.R. 5519<\/a>)\u00a0-Introduced by Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT), this bill would amend the Plant Protection Act for the purposes of mitigating the threat of invasive species, and for other purposes.<\/li>\n<li>Innovations in Mentoring, Training and Apprenticeships Act (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/house-bill\/5509?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%225509%22%5D%7D&amp;r=1\">H.R. 5509<\/a>) \u2014 Introduced by Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TN), this bill directs the National Science Foundation provide grants for research about STEM education approaches and the STEM-related workforce, and for other purposes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>Federal Register Opportunities<\/h2>\n<p>Public Meetings:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nsf.gov\/events\/event_summ.jsp?cntn_id=242952&amp;org=NSF\">NSF \u2013 National Science Board Meeting<\/a>\u00a0(May 2-3)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/02\/2018-06611\/programmatic-environmental-impact-statement-peis-for-the-marine-mammal-health-and-stranding-response\">NOAA NMFS \u2013 Meetings on Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program<\/a>\u00a0(Webinars on May 1, May 15 and May 21; In-person meeting in Silver Spring, MD May 18).<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/02\/2018-06673\/notice-of-public-meeting-for-the-utah-resource-advisory-councilrecreation-resource-advisory-council\">BLM \u2013 Meeting of the Utah Resource Advisory Council\/Recreation Advisory Council<\/a>\u00a0(May 21-22)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/12\/2018-07642\/environmental-modeling-public-meeting-notice-of-public-meeting\">EPA \u2013 Environmental Modeling Public Meeting<\/a>\u00a0(May 23)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2018-05649\">USFS \u2013 Collaborative Forest Restoration Program Technical Advisory Panel Meeting<\/a>\u00a0(April 30-May 4)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Opportunities for Public Comment:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/03\/29\/2018-06369\/intent-to-prepare-an-environmental-impact-statement-eis-for-the-pebble-project\">U.S. Army Corps of Engineers \u2013 Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Pebble Project<\/a>.The Alaska District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers intends to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to assess the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts associated with the proposed Pebble open pit mine in the wetlands, streams\u00a0and\u00a0Ocean near Cook Inlet. The EIS will also assess the potential effects of multiple alternatives.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pebbleprojecteis.com\/\">Public comment on the Pebble Project is available<\/a>, with comments due by June 29, 2018.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/02\/20\/2018-03407\/clean-water-act-coverage-of-discharges-of-pollutants-via-a-direct-hydrologic-connection-to-surface\">EPA-Clean Water Act Coverage of Discharges of Pollutants<\/a>.\u00a0Comment on whether or not the Environmental Protection Agency should offer clarification or revision of previous statements regarding the Clean Water Act, more specifically, whether pollutants that are discharged at point sources, but are then introduced to jurisdictional waters via connection to the hydrologic cycle may be subject to regulation by the Clean Water Act. Comments are due by May 21, 2018\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2018-03407\/p-5\">online<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2018-06026\">EPA \u2013 Biological Opinion on Pesticide Effects on Threatened or Endangered Species<\/a>.\u00a0The EPA is seeking comment on the final Biological Opinion (BiOp) issued under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), regarding the potential effects of chlorpyrifos, malathion, and diazinon on federally listed threatened or endangered species (listed species) and their designated critical habitats.\u00a0Submit comments by May 22, 2018.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2018-03906\">NOAA NMFS \u2013\u00a0Petition To List Chinook Salmon in the Upper Klamath-Trinity Rivers Basin as Endangered<\/a>.\u00a0Comment on a petition received by the National Marine Fisheries Service to classify the Upper Klamath-Trinity Rivers (UKTR) Chinook salmon Evolutionary Significant Unit as endangered in accordance with the Endangered Species Act. Comments are due by April 30, 2018, via\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2018-03906\/p-5\">online portal or mail<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2018-06057\">NOAA NMFS \u2013 Initiation of 5-Year Review for Threatened and Endangered Species<\/a>.\u00a0The National Marine Fisheries Service is initiating a 5-year review for the threatened Gulf of Maine distinct population segment (DPS), the endangered New York Bight DPS, the endangered Chesapeake Bay DPS, the endangered Carolina DPS, and the endangered South Atlantic DPS of Atlantic sturgeon. The 5-year review must be based on the best scientific and commercial data available at the time of the review. NMFS is requesting such information on the status of each DPS. Submit information by May 15, 2018.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/05\/2018-06929\/notice-of-availability-of-the-alabama-trustee-implementation-group-draft-restoration-plan\">NRCS \u2013 Notice of Availability and Opportunity for Comment \u2013 Alabama Draft Restoration Plan (Gulf Spill Restoration)<\/a>\u00a0Public comments on the plan can be submitted online through May 4, 2018.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/03\/05\/2018-04374\/reporting-requirements-regarding-findings-of-sexual-harassment-other-forms-of-harassment-or-sexual\">NSF \u2014\u00a0Reporting Requirements Regarding Findings of Sexual Harrassment, Other Forms of Harrrassment or Sexual Assault.<\/a>\u00a0The National Science Foundation is requesting public comments on a proposed reporting requirement for organizations that receive NSF funding. In this proposed requirement, awardee organizations must report finding\/determinations of sexual harrassment, other forms of harrassment, or sexual assault regarding an NSF funded Principal Investigator or any co-PI. Public comments are due May 4, 2018.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/03\/30\/2018-06496\/60-day-notice-of-proposed-information-collection-application-for-nonimmigrant-visa\">State Department \u2014 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Application for Nonimmigrant Visa<\/a>. The State Department is proposing adding several questions to the Online Application for Nonimmigrant Visa (DS-160) form, including a question about applicant\u2019s social media accounts.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/03\/2018-06686\/grand-mesa-uncompahgre-and-gunnison-national-forests-colorado-revision-of-the-land-and-resource\">USFS \u2013 Grand Mesa, Unpcompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Forest Plan Revision and Environmental Impact Statement<\/a>.The Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests in Colorado are revising their Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). Preliminary comments can be submitted through May 3, 2018.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/03\/12\/2018-04919\/conference-of-the-parties-to-the-convention-on-international-trade-in-endangered-species-of-wild\">USFWS \u2013 Public Input for Meeting of Conference of the Parties to CITES<\/a>.\u00a0The Fish and Wildlife Service is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/03\/12\/2018-04919\/conference-of-the-parties-to-the-convention-on-international-trade-in-endangered-species-of-wild\">seeking information and recommendations<\/a>\u00a0on items that the United States might consider submitting for discussion at the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES) Conference of Parties meeting in Sri Lanka in May and June 2019. Country representatives of the Convention meet periodically to review which species in international trade should be regulated and other aspects of the implementation of CITES. The FWS is inviting the public to provide information and recommendations on resolutions, decisions, and agenda items that the U.S. might consider submitting for discussion at\u00a0the meeting. The public comment period is open until May 11, 2018.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/02\/2018-06571\/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-reclassifying-the-hawaiian-goose-from-endangered-to\">USFWS- Proposed Rule to Reclassify the Hawaiian Goose from Endangered to Threatened under the Endangered Species Act<\/a>. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposing reclassifying the Hawaiian goose from endangered to threatened. The FWS is proposing a rule under section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act to enhance conservation of the species through range expansion and management flexibility. The FWS is seeking information, comments\u00a0and\u00a0data from the public on this proposed rule. Submit comments by June 1.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/02\/2018-06614\/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-draft-recovery-plan-for-four-invertebrate-species-of\">USFWS \u2013 Draft Recovery Plan for Four Invertebrate Species of the Pecos River Valley<\/a>\u00a0The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has released a draft recovery plan for four endangered invertebrate species \u2013 Noel\u2019s Amphipod, Koster\u2019s springsnail, Roswell springsnail, and Pecos assiminea \u2013 found in southeastern New Mexico and southwest Texas. The draft recovery plan includes recovery objects and criteria to be met in order for the species to be removed from the endangered species list. The USFWS is seeking comments, review and new information on these species. Submit comments by June 1.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/03\/2018-06631\/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-technicalagency-draft-recovery-plan-for-the-cumberland\">USFWS \u2013 Endangered Species Act Draft Recovery Plan for the Cumberland Darter.<\/a>The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has released\u00a0a draft\u00a0recovery plan for the endangered Cumberland darter. The agency is requesting review and comments on the draft plan from the public. Public comments close June 4, 2018.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/12\/2018-07347\/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-endangered-status-for-the-island-marble-butterfly-and\">USFWS \u2013 Endangered Status for the Island Marble Butterfly and Designation of Critical Habitat.<\/a>\u00a0The Fish and Wildlife Service proposes a rule that will add the Island Marble Butterfly to the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and to designate critical habitat for the island marble butterfly under the Act. The Fish and Wildlife Service will also announce the availability of a draft economic analysis (DEA) of the proposed designation of critical habitat for the island marble butterfly.\u00a0They will accept comments received or postmarked on or before June 11, 2018.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2018\/04\/17\/2018-07707\/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-90-day-findings-for-two-species\">USFWS \u2013\u00a0Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings for Two Species<\/a>. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is seeking any new information on the status and threats to the Cape mountain zebra (South Africa)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/federal-register-opportunities\/\">Visit this page on ESA\u2019s blog for updates on opportunities from the Federal Register<\/a>, including upcoming meetings and regulations open for public comment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>Register to Vote<\/h2>\n<p>The 2018 midterm elections are happening this November, with primaries starting in some states this month. On a national level, all seats in the House of Representatives and a third of the seats in the Senate will be contested. Several state governorships and many other state and local elections will also be contested. Be sure you are registered to vote in time to participate!\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rockthevote.org\/voting-information\/\">Learn more about voting policies and rights in your state and register to vote at Rock the Vote<\/a>, a nonprofit dedicated to engaging young people in politics.<br>\n<a id=\"news\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>ESA In the News<\/h2>\n<p>ESA regularly issues press releases to the media about journal articles and other Society news. Press coverage is kept up-to-date on our \u201cIn the News\u201d page.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esa\/public-affairs\/esa-communications\/esa-in-the-news-2\/\">Check out news stories here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>ESA Correspondence to Policymakers<\/h2>\n<p><a id=\"letters\"><\/a><br>\nView\u00a0letters and testimony from ESA\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esa\/public-affairs\/esa-policy\/letters-from-esa-president\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/ESC_ARPA_E_Statement_FY19_Final.pdf\">Energy Science Coalition Statement in Support of ARPA-E<\/a>\u00a0(April 16, 2018)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/CNSF-FY19-Advocacy-Letter.pdf\">Coalition for National Science Foundation Funding (CNSF) FY 2019 Appropriations Advocacy Letter\u00a0<\/a>(April 12, 2018)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/ESC_Funding_Statement_FY19_Final.pdf\">Energy Sciences Coalition FY 2019 Funding Statement for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science<\/a>\u00a0(March 30, 2018)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/ESC_Funding_Statement_FY19_Final.pdf\">Energy Sciences Coalition Thank You for FY 2018 Appropriations<\/a>\u00a0(March 30, 2018)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/2018_03_16-FY2019-Friends-of-ARS-Letter.pdf\">Friends of ARS Letter on FY 2019 ARS Appropriations<\/a>\u00a0(March 16, 2018)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/2018_02_21-CNSF-FY18-Letter.pdf\">CNSF Letter on FY 2018 Appropriations<\/a>\u00a0(Feb. 21, 2018)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/2018_02_16-Science-Society-Letter_Science-and-RD-Funding.pdf\">Energy Sciences Coalition FY 2018 Appropriations Statement<\/a>\u00a0(Feb. 16, 2018)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>ESA\u2019s policy activities work to infuse ecological knowledge into national policy decisions through activities such as policy statements, Capitol Hill briefings, Congressional Visits Days, and coalition involvement. Policy News Updates are bi-monthly summaries of major environmental and science policy news. They are produced by the Public Affairs Office of the Ecological Society of America.<\/p>\n<p>Send questions or comments to\u00a0 Alison Mize, director of public affairs,\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:alison@esa.org\">Alison@esa.org<\/a>\u00a0or Nicole Zimmerman, public affairs officer,\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:nicole@esa.org\">Nicole@esa.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Visit the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/\">ESA website<\/a>\u00a0to learn more about our activities and membership.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ESA Policy News In This Issue: 2018 Graduate Student Policy Award Hill Day Ten graduate students visit Washington, DC to meet with their members of Congress and advocate for science funding. Farm Bill Advances Farm bill moves out of House Committee. Ballast Discharge Bill Fails Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell attempted to include a provision on ballast water in unrelated&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":12399,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,91],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ecology-in-policy","category-policy-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13989\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12399"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}