{"id":1536,"date":"2009-08-04T20:31:49","date_gmt":"2009-08-05T00:31:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=1536"},"modified":"2009-08-04T20:31:49","modified_gmt":"2009-08-05T00:31:49","slug":"master-of-one-caterpillars-dodge-bird-predation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/2009\/08\/04\/master-of-one-caterpillars-dodge-bird-predation\/","title":{"rendered":"Master-of-one caterpillars dodge bird predation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Insect herbivore species often specialize on the host plants that they eat, evolving adaptations to use a plant\u2019s unique set of resources.\u00a0 But like any time you throw all your eggs in one basket, these caterpillars put themselves at risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.wesleyan.edu\/bio\/Singer\/singer.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Michael Singer<\/a> of Wesleyan University <a href=\"http:\/\/eco.confex.com\/eco\/2009\/techprogram\/P17868.HTM\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">gave a talk today<\/a> at the ESA Annual Meeting that evaluated these tradeoffs in caterpillars. \u201cA lot of evolutionary ecologists have pondered the advantages of being a specialist, and there are presumably tradeoffs,\u201d he said.\u00a0\u201cSpecialists have a smaller resource base, but they might be better adapted to their niche.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Singer and his colleagues wondered if there could be other advantages to specialization than better utilization of host plants as food. Specialists might also be more adept than generalists at, for example, using their host plants for defense or refuge from predation, specifically by birds.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">The team tested this idea by excluding birds from experimental plots in a temperate forest in Connecticut and surveying the density of generalist and specialist caterpillar species inside and outside the exclosures. In the exclosures, his team observed a surge in generalist density compared to natural areas. The number of specialists, however, only increased slightly. The conclusion? Bird predators were preferentially targeting generalists.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">The difference is likely due to the specialists\u2019 ability to take better advantage of their host plants, says Singer. Specialists can use chemicals from their host plant\u2019s tissue to make themselves toxic.\u00a0 While Singer\u2019s caterpillars don\u2019t do this, they might be more adept at camouflaging themselves by finding the best places to hide or to blend in.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Singer says that the interactions among the three trophic levels \u2013 plants, herbivores and predators \u2013 are the key to understanding the species\u2019 ecology and evolution. \u201cFood webs are complex, and that complexity is fundamental to understanding ecological specialization and diversity in natural ecosystems,\u201d he said.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Insect herbivore species often specialize on the host plants that they eat, evolving adaptations to use a plant\u2019s unique set of resources.\u00a0 But like any time you throw all your eggs in one basket, these caterpillars put themselves at risk. Michael Singer of Wesleyan University gave a talk today at the ESA Annual Meeting that evaluated these tradeoffs in caterpillars&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[87,2],"tags":[301,304],"class_list":["post-1536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-events","category-research","tag-esa-annual-meeting","tag-plant-insect-interactions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1536\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}