{"id":1630,"date":"2009-08-17T14:44:26","date_gmt":"2009-08-17T18:44:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=1630"},"modified":"2009-08-17T14:44:26","modified_gmt":"2009-08-17T18:44:26","slug":"esa-policy-news-aug-14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/2009\/08\/17\/esa-policy-news-aug-14\/","title":{"rendered":"ESA Policy News: Aug. 14"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/pao\/policyNews\/\/pn2009\/08142009.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-808 img-fluid\" style=\"margin: 5px 10px\" title=\"policy-news-logo_s\" src=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2009\/04\/policy-news-logo_s.bmp\" alt=\"policy-news-logo_s\" width=\"200\" height=\"179\"><\/a>ESA\u2019s biweekly Policy News, produced by our Policy Analyst Piper Corp, was released on Friday. You can read the full edition <a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/pao\/policyNews\/\/pn2009\/08142009.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">here<\/a>. One theme is the revival of the Sustainable Watershed Planning Act, which was drafted in June but then tabled.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Ecologists are becoming increasingly aware that a world potable water shortage may be looming (see <a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=1509\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">remarks by Sandra Postel<\/a> at ESA\u2019s Annual Meeting), but the general public seems slow on the uptake. The fact that this bill was pushed back once (it was scheduled for committee markup in June), is in its second draft and has no set date for completion seems to imply its lesser importance to lawmakers on the Hill. Certainly the climate and energy bill is important, but this water bill should prove to be the next important environmental legislation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">The bill, currently under its second draft in the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, would consolidate and coordinate water resource management efforts at all scales. Currently, water management activities and responsibilities are shared by agencies at all levels of government, often resulting in jurisdictional divides within watersheds. This out-of sync process leads to federal projects often overlapping and local projects neglecting to account for downstream or regional impacts.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">The original draft included provisions to:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">1.\u00a0 Create a sustainable watershed planning council, composed of ranking officials at the Environmental Protection Agency; the secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Transportation. Interior, Housing and Urban Development, and US Army; the chiefs of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; and state and tribal leaders.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">2.\u00a0 Establish a president-appointed director to implement federal policies governing sustainable water resources management.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">3.\u00a0 Create regional watershed planning boards, based on Army Corps of Engineers civil work districts, which would be responsible for developing five-year plans for water use and conservation.<\/span><\/p>\n<ol><\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">4.\u00a0 Provide eligible states with annual grants of up to $1.5 million for setting up water planning boards or supporting existing efforts. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ESA\u2019s biweekly Policy News, produced by our Policy Analyst Piper Corp, was released on Friday. You can read the full edition here. One theme is the revival of the Sustainable Watershed Planning Act, which was drafted in June but then tabled. Ecologists are becoming increasingly aware that a world potable water shortage may be looming (see remarks by Sandra Postel&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,91,48],"tags":[313,22],"class_list":["post-1630","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecology-in-policy","category-policy-news","category-ecology-and-society","tag-policy-news","tag-water"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1630","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1630"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1630\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}