{"id":1964,"date":"2009-10-23T13:48:53","date_gmt":"2009-10-23T17:48:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=1964"},"modified":"2009-10-23T13:48:53","modified_gmt":"2009-10-23T17:48:53","slug":"the-senate-climate-change-and-the-public-opinion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/2009\/10\/23\/the-senate-climate-change-and-the-public-opinion\/","title":{"rendered":"The Senate, climate change, and the public opinion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">On Wednesday, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">AAAS<\/a>) sent a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2009\/media\/1021climate_letter.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">letter, signed by 18 scientific organizations including ESA<\/a>, to each member of the Senate. The letter states the consensus views of the scientific community: that climate change is real, that it is mostly anthropogenic in source and that, if unchecked, it will create major threats to our society. The letter is an exceptionally concise and to-the-point summary of the dire climate situation. Read the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2009\/media\/1021climate_letter.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">full text here<\/a>.<br>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"http:\/\/pewresearch.org\/pubs\/1386\/cap-and-trade-global-warming-opinion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright img-fluid\" style=\"margin: 5px 10px\" src=\"http:\/\/pewresearch.org\/assets\/publications\/1836-1.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"302\" height=\"324\"><\/a>This letter is also especially important and timely given that <a href=\"http:\/\/pewresearch.org\/pubs\/1386\/cap-and-trade-global-warming-opinion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">a new poll out yesterday<\/a> by the Pew Research Center shows some changing opinions about global warming in the American populace. The trends are not so good: 57 percent believe there is solid evidence that the Earth is warming, compared to 71 percent a year and a half ago. Only 35 percent think that climate change is a serious problem, down from 44 percent last year.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Here\u2019s The Grist\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/2009-10-23-what-does-the-pew-poll-mean\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">David Roberts\u2019 take<\/a> on the issue:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The temptation is to respond to a poll like Pew\u2019s with lamentations about the state of science education\u2013to imagine that the public, like scientists, can be swayed by the weight of empirical evidence. But the most important political takeaway is almost the opposite: popular belief in the science of climate change will follow popular support for clean energy, not the other way around.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">While we like to think that rational people will listen to solid scientific reason, we know that people are the product of marketing, often believing <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2008\/US\/04\/02\/mccarthy.autsimtreatment\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">the word of a celebrity<\/a> or a person they can relate to over the scientific facts. It remains to be seen how societal changes to combat climate change will be somehow made desirable to the mainstream American public.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Wednesday, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) sent a letter, signed by 18 scientific organizations including ESA, to each member of the Senate. The letter states the consensus views of the scientific community: that climate change is real, that it is mostly anthropogenic in source and that, if unchecked, it will create major threats to our&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,48],"tags":[60,373,374,375,259],"class_list":["post-1964","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecology-in-policy","category-ecology-and-society","tag-climate-change","tag-david-roberts","tag-pew-research-center","tag-senate","tag-waxman-markey-climate-bill"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1964"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1964\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}