{"id":45,"date":"2007-04-16T17:02:00","date_gmt":"2007-04-16T21:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=45"},"modified":"2007-04-16T17:02:00","modified_gmt":"2007-04-16T21:02:00","slug":"policy-news-from-esas-public-affairs-office-april-13-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/2007\/04\/16\/policy-news-from-esas-public-affairs-office-april-13-2007\/","title":{"rendered":"Policy News from ESA&#8217;s Public Affairs Office, April 13, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>A Bi-Weekly Publication of the Ecological Society of America<\/h3>\n<p><strong>April 13, 2007 <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>In this Issue: <\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>CLIMATE: SUPREME COURT ORDERS EPA TO CONSIDER REGULATING GREENHOUSE GASES<\/li>\n<li>CLIMATE: WHITE HOUSE SAYS IPCC REPORT \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcREINFORCES\u2019 ADMINISTRATION POLICIES<\/li>\n<li>CLIMATE: CHINA VOWS TO PARTICIPATE IN TALKS ON FUTURE EMISSIONS FRAMEWORK<\/li>\n<li>CLIMATE: FOUNDATION OFFERS $100M FOR POLICY RESEARCH<\/li>\n<li>ENDANGERED SPECIES: FEDS MAY RECLASSIFY ENDANGERED FL MANATEES<\/li>\n<li>FORESTS: BUSH ADMIN MOVES FORWARD WITH ROADLESS APPEAL, IDAHO REPEAL<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>****************************************************************<\/p>\n<p>CLIMATE: SUPREME COURT ORDERS EPA TO CONSIDER REGULATING GREENHOUSE GASES<br>\nThe Bush administration must consider regulating carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles, the Supreme Court said April 2 in its first decision addressing legal issues surrounding global warming.\u00c2  In a 5-4 ruling on Massachusetts v. EPA , the court sided with 11 states and 13 environmental groups that sued U.S. EPA to force the agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from new cars and trucks.<\/p>\n<p>Writing for the majority, Justice John Stevens rejected Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s (EPA) position that the Clean Air Act does not grant the agency the authority to issue mandatory regulations addressing climate change \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and that even if EPA held that authority, a federal rule would do little to stem any effects from climate change on Massachusetts or the other petitioners, given that U.S. auto emissions only account for about 7 percent of global fossil fuel emissions and about 30 percent of domestic emissions.<\/p>\n<p>Joining Justice Stevens in the majority opinion were Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy and David Souter.<\/p>\n<p>Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas offered two dissents, one written by Roberts and one by Scalia.<\/p>\n<p>The Ecological Society of America weighed in on this case in November 2006: <a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/pao\/newsroom\/pressReleases2006\/11292006.php\">https:\/\/esa.org\/pao\/newsroom\/pressReleases2006\/11292006.php <\/a><\/p>\n<p>CLIMATE: WHITE HOUSE SAYS IPCC REPORT \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcREINFORCES\u2019 ADMINISTRATION POLICIES<br>\nThe Bush Administration said April 6 that the latest report by an international scientific panel examining the effects of climate change would lead to no shift in U.S. global climate change policies that shun mandatory curbs on emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.<\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153This report reinforces\u00e2\u20ac\u009d administration policies that emphasize technology development and the production of alternative fuels, said President Bush\u2019s top environmental adviser, James Connaughton. Finalized after tense, all-night negotiations, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report for the first time links human activities to climate change at a regional scale and forecasts stark impacts caused by rising temperatures \u00e2\u20ac\u201d desertification, species extinctions and melting glaciers.<\/p>\n<p>Connaughton, who chairs the White House Council on Environmental Quality, called the IPCC findings \u00e2\u20ac\u0153a reinforcement of a piece of what underlined the President\u2019s State of the Union this year \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 this idea that we can replace 20 percent of our petroleum usage\u00e2\u20ac\u009d over the next decade.\u00c2  Asked whether the IPCC report strengthened the case for a mandatory emissions cap, an idea pushed by many congressional Democrats, Connaughton said the fuels program \u00e2\u20ac\u0153is a mandatory cap.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n<p>In sharp contrast to the White House\u2019s reaction to the report, congressional Democrats said the document strengthens the case for enacting climate legislation as soon as possible.<\/p>\n<p>CLIMATE: CHINA VOWS TO PARTICIPATE IN TALKS ON FUTURE EMISSIONS FRAMEWORK<br>\nChina announced April 11 that it would participate in discussions of post-Kyoto Protocol global climate change mitigation efforts, in a major move toward international cooperation for the country that is expected to become the world\u2019s top greenhouse gas emitter as early as 2010.<\/p>\n<p>While China signed the Kyoto Protocol in 1998, as a developing country it did not have to commit to GHG reduction targets. The United States refused to sign on the grounds that developed countries were unfairly penalized. Since then, China has ramped up its industrial infrastructure and was responsible for 18 percent of carbon dioxide emissions in 2004, according to Japanese researchers. The United States produced 21 percent of emissions that year; some experts think China will pass the United States as early as 2010.\u00c2  Another harbinger of China\u2019s growing commitment to addressing global climate change is many Chinese farmers\u2019 increasing awareness of the phenomenon\u2019s effects.<\/p>\n<p>CLIMATE: FOUNDATION OFFERS $100M FOR POLICY RESEARCH<br>\nThe Doris Duke Charitable Foundation will begin offering nearly $100 million in grants for research intended to develop policies for reducing global warming.<\/p>\n<p>Announced April 9, the Foundation\u2019s climate change project is based on the belief that creating smart climate change policy will lead to the adoption of clean-energy technologies. It will support research for alternative energy requirements and developing a system to either tax or establish a cap-and-trade scheme for carbon emissions.<\/p>\n<p>ENDANGERED SPECIES: FEDS MAY RECLASSIFY ENDANGERED FL MANATEES<br>\nThe Florida manatee may soon lose some of its protections under the federal Endangered Species Act, according to an internal Fish and Wildlife Service memo on the species\u2019 status.<\/p>\n<p>Concluding that the manatee \u00e2\u20ac\u0153no longer meets the definition of an endangered species,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d an internal FWS memo is recommending changing the sea cow\u2019s status from \u00e2\u20ac\u0153endangered\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153threatened,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d a move that would lift some restrictions on boating and development near Florida\u2019s waters.<\/p>\n<p>The memo, dated March 26, follows one of the worst years for the Florida manatee on record. Of about 3,200 manatees living in Florida waters, 416 died last year, the highest number of deaths recorded in 30 years. The deaths were primarily due to collisions with boat propellers.<\/p>\n<p>The memo reflects the conclusions of a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Five-Year Review\u00e2\u20ac\u009d of manatees. FWS spokesman Chuck Underwoord said that while the memo reflects the agency\u2019s conclusions at the time, that opinion may change by the time the review is released later this month.<\/p>\n<p>FORESTS: BUSH ADMIN MOVES FORWARD WITH ROADLESS APPEAL, IDAHO REPEAL<br>\nThe Bush administration is moving ahead with its two-pronged push to curtail the Clinton-era roadless rule for national forests, asking a federal appeals court to lift the restrictions and announcing plans to remove roadless protections from Idaho forests.<\/p>\n<p>On April 6, the Justice Department announced it would appeal a September decision by a San Francisco judge that reinstated the Clinton-era rule placing about 50 million acres of national forest off-limits to road-building, logging and other development.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the Forest Service said April 10 it would begin a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) on the state of Idaho\u2019s proposal to remove 9.3 million acres of national forests from the roadless rule, replacing the roadless designation with a patchwork of management plans, some of which would allow timber cuts.<\/p>\n<p>The Ecological Society of America has previously commented on the roadless issue, including a letter from then-President Bill Schlesinger in 2004:\u00c2  <a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/pao\/policyStatements\/Letters\/LetterUtahDisclaimerInterest05072004.php\">https:\/\/esa.org\/pao\/policyStatements\/Letters\/LetterUtahDisclaimerInterest05072004.php <\/a><\/p>\n<p>===============================================================<\/p>\n<p>Sources: Energy and Environment Daily and Greenwire<\/p>\n<p>Send questions or comments to Nadine Lymn, ESA Director of Public Affairs, <a href=\"mailto:Nadine@esa.org\">Nadine@esa.org <\/a> or Colleen Fahey, Policy Analyst, <a href=\"mailto:Colleen@esa.org\">Colleen@esa.org <\/a><\/p>\n<p>See past editions of ESA\u2019s Policy News at <a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/pao\/policyNews\/\">https:\/\/esa.org\/pao\/policyNews\/ <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Read the latest biweekly Policy News from ESA&#8217;s Public Affairs Office.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,91],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecology-in-policy","category-policy-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}