{"id":4650,"date":"2011-02-04T12:27:19","date_gmt":"2011-02-04T16:27:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=4650"},"modified":"2011-02-04T12:27:19","modified_gmt":"2011-02-04T16:27:19","slug":"panda-paradox-which-came-first-a-taste-for-bamboo-or-a-distaste-for-meat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/2011\/02\/04\/panda-paradox-which-came-first-a-taste-for-bamboo-or-a-distaste-for-meat\/","title":{"rendered":"Panda paradox: Which came first, a taste for bamboo or a distaste for meat?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>This post contributed by Monica Kanojia, Administrative Assistant\/Governance for ESA<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2011\/02\/539567985_38fb64d8a2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-4651 img-fluid\" title=\"Giant Panda\" src=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2011\/02\/539567985_38fb64d8a2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"560\" height=\"372\" srcset=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2011\/02\/539567985_38fb64d8a2.jpg 500w, https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2011\/02\/539567985_38fb64d8a2-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 560px) 100vw, 560px\" \/><\/a><span style=\"color: #000000\">While  a vegetarian lifestyle is a choice made by omnivorous humans, the panda  population may have been forced to convert \u00a0to a vegetarian diet  between 2 and 7 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/mg20827893.900-how-the-giant-panda-lost-its-taste-for-flesh.html\">million<\/a> years ago to ensure survival. The preference for bamboo is unusual for <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Giant_panda\">pandas<\/a>because they are classified as carnivores \u00a0even though their diet is  99% bamboo. Even more unusual is the fact that their digestive system is  unable to process cellulose, the major component of plant cell walls.  According to research published in <span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v463\/n7279\/pdf\/nature08696.pdf\">Nature<\/a>, the bamboo diet is both influenced by genetics, and it depends on the digestive microbes present in the panda gut. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Everything  from what we eat, to what we taste, to how we eat is determined by our  genetics. Umami\u2014the basic taste associated with an amino acid common in  protein heavy foods like meat\u2014is sensed through the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v463\/n7279\/pdf\/nature08696.pdf\">T1R<\/a> gene family in carnivores. But in pandas, the T1R gene family has experienced mutations causing the inactivation of the T1R1 gene, making it a pseudogene.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Pseudogenes  have either lost protein coding ability or are no longer expressed in  the cell. Ruiqiang Li and the team who sequenced the genome found that  the malfunction of the T1R1 gene occurred relatively recently in the panda lineage: Estimated loss was about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/mg20827893.900-how-the-giant-panda-lost-its-taste-for-flesh.html\">4.2 million years ago<\/a>. The malfunction of the umami taste receptor may explain why pandas have a preference for bamboo versus meat.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Gene  mutations are random and can change the habits of an organism,  affecting its entire existence. In the case of the pandas, it changed  the way pandas perceived meat. Despite the loss of taste for meat the  digestive system of the pandas remained able to process it because all  the enzymes required to were still present in their system. The ability  to process plant material on the other hand was not natural. According  to Li et al.\u2019s research pandas do not have the necessary enzymes to  digest bamboo, hinting at the idea that their ability to do so is  dependent upon their gut microbes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Luckily  for the endangered pandas, according to a molecular analysis conducted  by Li and his colleagues, they have a very high rate of genetic  variation in spite of their low population numbers. The abundance of  some genetic changes within the gene pool can be reduced by natural  selection, while other \u201cmore favorable\u201d mutations may accumulate and  result in adaptive changes; this may be part of the reason why the panda  population converted from meat eaters to plant eaters as well.  Logically, it would go as follows: The panda population experienced a  mutation affecting taste buds which caused, or contributed to, a switch  to a bamboo diet. If the bamboo diet increased their survival rate  (which would have increased their reproductive levels), over time, the  mutation of their taste buds would comprise the majority of the  population, if not all of it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">The  question then becomes what happened first: Did pandas confront  environmental factors which limited meat, causing nonfunctioning genes?  Or did they lose their T1R1  function, leading to the dietary change? Since the exact dietary  conversion date is still unknown, it\u2019s a bit more difficult to determine  whether the meat went first, or the taste for it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Monica Kanojia is a George Mason University graduate with a B.S. in  Biology. She has interned at NSF and contributed articles to  LiveScience.com. She has also interned with EarthShot Foundation, an  environmentally based NGO focused on driving a clean energy revolution.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Photo Credit: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/fwp\/539567985\/sizes\/m\/in\/photostream\/\">Frank Peters<\/a><br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post contributed by Monica Kanojia, Administrative Assistant\/Governance for ESA While a vegetarian lifestyle is a choice made by omnivorous humans, the panda population may have been forced to convert \u00a0to a vegetarian diet between 2 and 7 million years ago to ensure survival. The preference for bamboo is unusual for pandasbecause they are classified as carnivores \u00a0even though their&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1151,1152,1153,102,543,658,353,924,1154],"class_list":["post-4650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research","tag-bamboo","tag-carnivore","tag-diet","tag-evolution","tag-genes","tag-genome","tag-giant-pandas","tag-nutrition","tag-taste"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4650\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}