{"id":4769,"date":"2011-02-16T17:17:13","date_gmt":"2011-02-16T21:17:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=4769"},"modified":"2011-02-16T17:17:13","modified_gmt":"2011-02-16T21:17:13","slug":"when-you-cant-have-the-moon-start-a-rock-collection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/2011\/02\/16\/when-you-cant-have-the-moon-start-a-rock-collection\/","title":{"rendered":"When you can\u2019t have the moon, start a rock collection"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>This post contributed by Terence Houston, ESA\u2019s science policy analyst.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2011\/02\/moon.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-4772 img-fluid\" title=\"Moon\" src=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2011\/02\/moon.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"544\" height=\"408\" srcset=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2011\/02\/moon.jpg 500w, https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2011\/02\/moon-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 544px) 100vw, 544px\" \/><\/a>Many proponents of efforts to address climate change went into the beginning of the 111<sup>th<\/sup> Congress thinking they were going to make some significant headway.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">For the first time since 1994, Democrats had the rare fortune of holding the White House coupled with substantial majorities in both the House and Senate. But, while the House was indeed <a href=\"http:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/evs\/2009\/roll477.xml\">successful<\/a> in squeezing through comprehensive climate legislation, Senate negotiators could not come to an agreement and the bill died.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Efforts to pass legislation curbing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions seemed less likely when the House gained 63 Republican seats and Senate Republicans gained six seats after the Nov. 2010 mid-term elections. However, a dissection into the backgrounds and ideologies of individual members of the new Republican majority on energy and environmental issues suggest that \u00a0while any major climate change legislation is unlikely, there may exist a few opportunities for incremental successes in decreasing GHG emissions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">During a recent event I attended that was sponsored by the <em>National Journal<\/em>, House Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton, revealed \u00a0a glimpse into his priorities as well as his take on what type of legislation may move forward in the 112<sup>th<\/sup> Congress.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Chairman Upton could be referred to as a \u201cborn-again\u201d climate skeptic. During the briefing, he stated that while he accepts that the climate is changing, he does not believe the changes are man-made. Upton has joined with Environment and Public Works Committee Ranking Member James Inhofe (R-OK) in sponsoring legislation that would limit the Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s ability to regulate greenhouse gases. Last year, in his attempt to win the committee\u2019s chairmanship and appear more conservative, he removed from his website language stating that climate change is a \u201cserious problem that necessitates serious solutions.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Delving further into Chairman Upton\u2019s background reveals a somewhat more complex stance on energy and environmental issues. Upton in 2007 successfully spearheaded legislation to phase out incandescent light bulbs in favor of the more energy-efficient fluorescent light bulbs, a move that put his prospective chairmanship in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/1110\/45059.html\">jeopardy<\/a>. Additionally, Upton was among 26 Republicans to vote in favor of the New Direction for Energy Independence, National Security and Consumer Protection Act, an omnibus energy bill that contained a clean energy standard.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Others in the new House majority have also demonstrated support in the recent past to expand the nation\u2019s energy portfolio beyond fossil fuels.\u00a0 On Aug. 4, 2007, Tom Udall (D-NM) and Todd Russell Platts (R-PA) sponsored an <a href=\"http:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/evs\/2007\/roll827.xml\">amendment<\/a> to the Energy Independence bill calling for a 15 percent national renewable electricity standard by 2020. Upton was not among the 32 Republicans who supported the amendment, but a few now-prominent Republicans did, including House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI). House Appropriations Commerce, Justice and Science Committee Chairman Frank Wolf (R-VA) supported both the Udall-Platts amendment and the overall omnibus energy bill. This could partially explain why Wolf treaded lightly on the Obama administration\u2019s proposal for a clean energy standard, only stating that he is \u201canxious to see the details\u201d without affirming a concrete stance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">A thorough analysis of the current House Republican caucus indicates there may be a number of potential moderates, at least among those whose votes parallel the ideology of their constituents. Currently, thirty-one Republican Members of Congress represent districts carried by Obama in 2008. Of these seats, 13 also went for the 2004 Presidential nominee, John Kerry. The voting tendency of these districts suggests the current Republican members representing them can only tread so far to the right of their progressive constituents. Even taking into account any potential impact of the 2012 census redistricting, these numbers are significant.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">The 13 Republican members include freshmen Reps. Sean Duffy (R-WI), Pat Meehan (R-PA), Lou Barletta (R-PA), Steve Stivers (R-OH),\u00a0 Chip Cravaack (R-MN), Robert Dold (R-IL), Bobby Schilling (R-IL), Allen West (R-FL) as well as Reps. David Reichert (R-WA),\u00a0 Jim Gerlach (R-PA), Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Charles Dent (R-PA) and Charles Bass (R-NH). Of the Members listed, only Rep. West, a tea-party favorite, has broadcast himself as being a far-right conservative.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">During the <em>National Journal<\/em> forum, Chairman Upton touted his bipartisan record of working on successful legislative initiatives with the likes of Edolphus Towns (D-NY), Edward Markey (D-MA) and Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) among others. He urged Democrats to look to Republicans and vice versa, noting that bipartisan legislation has a significantly better chance of making it through the Senate, where there is also room for optimism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">As a recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/0211\/49446.html\">article<\/a> in POLITICO pointed out, 10 of the 13 Republican freshmen are taking the more traditional freshman Senator approach of learning the process behind the scenes and not throwing partisan bombs and lofty ideological proposals out of the gate. A small handful of the GOP freshmen hail from swing states. Sens. Kelly Ayote (R-NH) and Mark Kirk (R-IL), to name but two, could prove to be key moderates in energy and environmental debates.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">As a Congressman, Rep. Kirk was among 34 Republicans who voted <a href=\"http:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/evs\/2005\/roll506.xml\">against<\/a> a 2005 bill by then-Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) to strip the Endangered Species Act authority to designate \u201ccritical habitat\u201d for an endangered species. He was also among eight House Republicans to <a href=\"http:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/evs\/2009\/roll477.xml\">vote<\/a> in favor of the Democrats\u2019 2009 comprehensive climate change legislation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Senator Ayoute\u2019s current stance on the environment appears mixed. As a candidate, she signed a no carbon tax pledge and expressed doubt that human activities are causing climate change.\u00a0 Yet during a debate with another candidate, Ayoute said that scientific evidence has shown that human activity could have contributed to higher temperatures. However, her <a href=\"http:\/\/www.concordmonitor.com\/article\/222500\/as-ag-ayotte-took-on-pollution\">record<\/a> in public service clearly indicates some commitment to curbing pollution. As NH Attorney General, Ayotte joined 12 other attorneys general in signing a 2005 letter to a Senate committee opposing the Clear Skies Act of 2005 because it ignored global climate change. Ayotte also joined two multi-state lawsuits against the Environmental Protection Agency during the previous administration, arguing that the federal government was weakening environmental protection laws.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Reviewing your Member of Congress\u2019s record with a fine-toothed comb is certainly tedious, but it can potentially lead to the discovery of previously unknown areas of common interest. It\u2019s important to not only understand the positions of Members of Congress, but also the needs and concerns of the communities they represent. Doing so will help you frame your argument, as well as uncover specific topics and opportunities that give your concern resonance. Having a common frame of reference or a starting point of commonality can become an important foundation for moving forward on any proposal or initiative.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">We can all work collectively to begin the process of finding common ground and areas where the potential for incremental success may be possible, culminating in the long run towards giant leaps in achievements for the nation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Photo Credit: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/jpstanley\/211486641\/in\/photostream\/\">Jeremy Stanley<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post contributed by Terence Houston, ESA\u2019s science policy analyst. Many proponents of efforts to address climate change went into the beginning of the 111th Congress thinking they were going to make some significant headway. For the first time since 1994, Democrats had the rare fortune of holding the White House coupled with substantial majorities in both the House and&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":43,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[60,134,132,53,93,1077,1039,375,1173],"class_list":["post-4769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecology-in-policy","tag-climate-change","tag-congress","tag-energy","tag-energy-policy","tag-epa","tag-greenhouse-gas-emissions","tag-house","tag-senate","tag-upton"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/43"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4769\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}