{"id":6192,"date":"2011-11-04T17:05:33","date_gmt":"2011-11-04T21:05:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=6192"},"modified":"2011-11-04T17:05:33","modified_gmt":"2011-11-04T21:05:33","slug":"esa-policy-news-november-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/2011\/11\/04\/esa-policy-news-november-4\/","title":{"rendered":"ESA Policy News: November 4"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here are some highlights from the latest ESA Policy News by Science Policy Analyst Terence Houston. Read the full Policy News here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

APPROPRIATIONS: SENATE PASSES \u2018MINI-BUS\u2019 FUNDING NSF, NOAA<\/strong><\/p>\n

On Nov. 1, the Senate passed a mini omnibus (\u201cminibus\u201d) measure that incorporated three individual appropriations bills: Commerce Justice and Science, Transportation Housing and Urban Development as well as the Agriculture Rural Development Food and Drug Administration appropriations for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012. The minibus bill (H.R. 2112) passed with bipartisan support by a vote of 69-30. Sixteen Republicans joined all Democrats and Independents in supporting the measure.<\/p>\n

Funding levels are largely unchanged from the measures approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee two months ago. The bill includes $6.7 million for the National Science Foundation, a reduction of $162 million from FY 2011. For the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, the bill includes $5 billion, a $434 million increase from FY 2011. The Senate measure increases investment in NOAA research initiatives, including $161.5 million for the agency\u2019s climate service. The House bill prohibits funding for the climate service.<\/p>\n

For the Agricultural Research Service, the FY 2012 bill provides $1.09 billion, down from $1.133 billion in FY 2011.\u00a0\u00a0The bill provides $709.8 million for research and education activities within the National Institute on Food and Agriculture, up from $698.7 million in FY 2011. The Natural Resources Conservation Service would receive $828 million for FY 2012, down from $871 million in FY 2011.<\/p>\n

For more information on the science-related components of the appropriations measure, see the Sept. 23 edition<\/a> of ESA Policy News or see the \u00a0Sept. 9\u00a0edition<\/a> of ESA Policy News for more information on the agricultural research components of the measure.<\/p>\n

OCEANS: ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS DEFEND NATIONAL OCEANS POLICY<\/strong><\/p>\n

On Oct. 26, the House Natural Resources Committee convened a hearing on the Obama administration\u2019s National Ocean Policy. While this was the second hearing by the committee to examine the policy, it was the first to feature testimony from key senior officials from the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ).<\/p>\n

House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings (R-WA) said the plan\u00a0 places restrictions on ocean and coastal inland activities. \u201cI have asked the administration for the specific statutory authority that allows the president, by executive order, to create regional planning bodies and require them to create regional zoning plans. So far, I have been given only a hodge-podge list of all the statutes that apply to ocean and\/or coastal activities,\u201d he said. Hastings cited the policy as a \u201chuge new bureaucracy\u201d that could \u201ccost jobs and have devastating long-term economic impacts throughout the country.\u201d Chairman Hastings asserted that the executive order creates \u201cdozens of new policies\u201d that create uncertainty for businesses and job creators.<\/p>\n

\u201cOceans, coasts and the Great Lakes play a crucial role in the life of every American and in the economic well-being of our nation. Over half the nation lives in coastal counties and the other half often go there to play. Coastal counties generate almost 60 percent of U.S. GDP and coastal habitats provide buffers against coastal storms, preventing more than $20 billion in property losses every year and many of them also provide nursery grounds for many economically important fish and shellfish,\u201d stated NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe importance of integrated approaches to ocean activities has been recognized across administrations. The [George W.] Bush administration\u2019s U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy emphasized the need to eliminate barriers between federal agencies with ocean and coastal mandates and streamline processes to improve scientific understanding, share data and coordinate policy setting and decision-making to maximize federal resources,\u201d continued Lubchenco. \u201cThe National Ocean Policy and the Framework for [Effective] Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning continue this integration, but equally importantly, they empower communities to shape the future of their regional ocean uses.\u201d<\/p>\n

The subsequent panelists included Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance, Randall Luthi, President of the National Ocean Industries Association and Michael Conathan Director of Ocean Policy of Center of American Progress.<\/p>\n

View the hearing here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

FISHERIES: NEW REPORT HIGHLIGHTS ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF USFWS PROGRAM<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

On Nov. 3, the Department of Interior\u2019s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) announced the release of a report entitled \u201c<\/em>An Assessment of Economic Contributions from Fisheries and Aquatic Resource Conservation.\u201d The report seeks to highlight the varied economic contributions made by the agency\u2019s \u00a0Fisheries Program. <\/em><\/p>\n

<\/em><\/p>\n

According to the report, the USFWS\u2019s Fisheries Program <\/em>contributes $3.6 billion to the nation\u2019s economy and supports 68,000 jobs across the country. It states that that each dollar invested in the fisheries program, combined with its partners, generates about $28 in economic contributions and value.<\/p>\n

View the full report here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORUNITY: OSTP PUBLISHES BIOECONOMY BLUEPRINT<\/strong><\/p>\n

The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy has published a Request for Information to solicit input for research innovations to meet national economic challenges.<\/p>\n

On Sept. 16, President Obama announced his administration would develop a National Bioeconomy Blueprint detailing administration-wide steps to harness biological innovations that address efforts to alleviate concerns in human society related to health, food, energy and the environment.<\/p>\n

OSTP encourages comments submitted electronically as an attachment to an e-mail sent to\u00a0bioeconomy@ostp.gov<\/a> by 11:59 p.m. EST on December 6, 2011<\/span><\/strong>.\u00a0More information on the blueprint can be found here<\/a> or view the actual Request for Information here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITY: RICE CULTIVATION PROJECT<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Climate Action Reserve has announced a new draft Rice Cultivation Project Protocol V1.0 available for public review and comment.\u00a0The protocol provides a standardized approach for quantifying, monitoring, and verifying the greenhouse gas reductions from projects that avoid methane emissions to the atmosphere through changes in water and residue management in rice cultivation.<\/p>\n

Comments are due no later than 5:00 pm PST on November 11, 2011<\/span><\/strong>.\u00a0For more information as well as to review the draft protocol and submit comments, click here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

WATER: ESA SPONSORS CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING ON FLOOD MANAGEMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n

On November 2, the Ecological Society of America sponsored a congressional briefing entitled \u201cUsing Science to Improve Flood Management.\u201d The briefing drew 40 attendees, including congressional staff and representatives of federal agencies, NGOs and private organizations. Featured speakers were Emily Stanley (University of Wisconsin, Madison, Center for Limnology) and Jeff Opperman (Senior Freshwater Scientist, The Nature Conservancy, Ohio Field Office).<\/p>\n

The speakers addressed the function of rivers and floodplains and the need to manage rivers as systems and for multiple benefits.\u00a0Their presentations highlighted the potential for green infrastructure solutions, which would restore floodplains to help reduce risk to people and infrastructure and generate such benefits as increased fish production. The nation\u2019s growing economic burden from flood damage as well as its aging levee infrastructure make this option a timely one, said Stanely and Opperman.<\/p>\n

AIR POLLUTION: ESA COSPONSORS CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING ON MERCURY<\/strong><\/p>\n

On Oct. 25, the Ecological Society of America (ESA) helped organize and co-sponsored the congressional briefing: \u201cMercury and Air Pollution Impacts on Ecosystems.\u201d\u00a0 Other organizations sponsoring the briefing were the Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI), the Great Lakes Commission, and the Northeast-Midwest Institute.<\/p>\n

The briefing featured the findings of a recent report from BRI highlighting mercury pollution in the Great Lakes region. According to the BRI report, emissions of mercury into the air (and subsequent deposition) are now the primary source of mercury pollution in the Great Lakes region. Twenty-six percent of mercury deposition in Canada and the continental United States is from the Great Lakes region, with the highest concentrations in Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin.<\/p>\n

The event featured speakers Charley Driscoll (Syracuse University) and Dave Evers (BRI) and drew 30 attendees\u00a0 A preprint of ESA\u2019s new Issues in Ecology<\/em> #14 on air pollution thresholds was also discussed by the speakers and made available to the audience.<\/p>\n

View the BRI report here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here are some highlights from the latest ESA Policy News by Science Policy Analyst Terence Houston. Read the full Policy News here. APPROPRIATIONS: SENATE PASSES \u2018MINI-BUS\u2019 FUNDING NSF, NOAA On Nov. 1, the Senate passed a mini omnibus (\u201cminibus\u201d) measure that incorporated three individual appropriations bills: Commerce Justice and Science, Transportation Housing and Urban Development as well as the Agriculture…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":43,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,91],"tags":[635,158,664,134,7,17,35,1202,524,247,1307,1258,66,113,67,115,57,172],"class_list":["post-6192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecology-in-policy","category-policy-news","tag-air-pollution","tag-budget","tag-ceq","tag-congress","tag-conservation","tag-fish","tag-fisheries","tag-flood","tag-great-lakes","tag-jane-lubchenco","tag-mercury","tag-national-oceanic-atmospheric-administration","tag-national-science-foundation","tag-noaa","tag-nsf","tag-ostp","tag-pollution","tag-the-nature-conservancy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/43"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6192"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6192\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}