![\"public](\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2012\/07\/PPSR-LOGO_Banner-font-switch_03.png\" "\\"public"){kind=logo}
<\/a><\/p>\nThe idea of a big, cross-disciplinary meeting had been floating around citizen science circles for a while. Though public participation in scientific research has deep roots in the history of science, in the last few years it has taken off spectacularly from launch pads across the disciplines of science and education, fueled by advances in communications technology and a sea change in a scientific culture now eager to welcome outsiders as collaborators. There was a feeling that the time had come to muster the leadership from their independent community science fiefdoms for an intellectual potlatch.<\/p>\n
Citizen science, crowd-sourced science, DIY research, volunteer monitoring, community participatory action research \u2013 the variety of banners flying over participatory science projects reflects the diversity of their origins, from astronomy to zoology. Workshops had been organized before, notably by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, but they were small, field-oriented, and unable to meet growing demand.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe participatory science field has been growing, but in isolated silos. Even within the environmental sciences, the water quality people self-organize separately from the biology people,\u201d said Abe Miller-Rushing, a science coordinator for the National Park Service up at Acadia National Park, in Maine. \u201cWe really wanted to have an open-invite meeting that emphasized innovation, and could kick-start conversations.\u201d<\/p>\n
So Miller-Rushing and a handful of scientists and educators hatched a plan to make their dream meeting happen. It all comes together on August 4th<\/sup>-5th<\/sup> as a conference-within-a-conference at ESA\u2019s 2012 annual meeting in Portland, Oregon: the \u201cPublic Participation in Scientific Research<\/a> Conference\u201d (technically ESA\u2019s \u201cworkshop #1<\/a>\u201d for organizational purposes, it starts early on Saturday morning, before ESA\u2019s main event kicks off with the Sunday evening keynote).<\/p>\n \u201cJennifer and I were talking about this at a meeting, and I think Rick was there too, and we decided \u2013 hey, let\u2019s just do it<\/strong>.\u201d [Update, 8\/2\/2012: Rick Bonney phoned me to correct the record: the PPSR conference was actually conceived over a large pot of chili at Jennifer\u2019s house, out in the woods near Ithaca, NY. The three (and Jennifer\u2019s husband Sam, famous chili artist) got to rehashing the need for an open-invite meeting. \u201cAnd Abe said, you know, I really think that we could pull this off if we worked with ESA on it.\u201d \u2013Thanks for the update, Rick!]<\/span><\/p>\n Miller-Rushing will open the upcoming conference with a presentation on the history of public participation in scientific research. He has a paper on the same topic, with Richard Primack of Boston University and Rick Bonney of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, in the upcoming August 2012 special issue of ESA\u2019s journal Frontiers<\/em><\/a> in Ecology and the Environment, <\/em>\u201cCitizen Science \u2013 new pathways to public involvement in research,\u201d timed to coincide with the conference.<\/p>\n Other invited speakers<\/a> hail from public health, biochemistry, education, geography, and atmospheric sciences, at universities, government agencies, and indigenous organizations. \u00a0Organizers expect over 150 poster presentations.<\/p>\n Jennifer Shirk, a conference co-organizer, has an article on \u201cThe current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement,\u201d with Janis Dickinson and several more people from the Cornell Labs in the special issue. Other authors address the future of the field. The issue will be open access, and available on August 1st<\/sup>.<\/p>\n Citizen science projects give non-specialists the power to apply their curiosity about the natural world, and their love of puzzles and games, to real scientific questions. Projects have recruited naturalists and novices to classify galaxies, refine protein models, align DNA sequences, identify and count birds, record weather, and track plant and animal life through the changing of the seasons.<\/p>\n Many participatory science initiatives started with a researcher\u2019s need for additional hands, eyes, and boots on the ground. With the help of dedicated hobbyists, enthusiastic school kids and teachers, and curious on-lookers, they could multiply data collection and analysis by orders of magnitude, essentially creating thousands of lab and field assistants.<\/p>\n Educators and scientific organizations soon saw the potential for learning-through-doing, drawing the practice of science back into public life \u2013 from which it has grown increasingly estranged.<\/p>\n \u201cSome people will say that citizen science will save the world, and some say that it\u2019s trash science,\u201d said Miller-Rushing. There tendency toward hyperbole, but \u201cthis meeting should give people a chance to talk about it realistically, and hash out some things.\u201d<\/p>\n Disciplines have tended to develop favored styles. Ecology and other environmental sciences tend toward monitoring \u2013 of water quality, weather, animal presence and number [like eBird<\/a>], plant and animal \u201cphenology\u201d or the timing of developmental changes with physical cycles [Nature\u2019s Notebook<\/a>] \u2013 while the more molecular-scale sciences have developed interactive games [Foldit<\/a>; Phylo<\/a>].\u00a0 Astronomy has tended to be image-oriented, with programs like Galaxy Zoo<\/a>. Public health has a history of involving patient (although public health scientists don\u2019t like the term \u201cpatient!\u201d) communities in a cyclical re-development of epidemiological programs.<\/p>\n Citizen science as a field stands to gain from borrowing techniques across specialties, and banding together to work on shared challenges \u2013 like sustainability of funding and staff, databasing solutions for large, sometimes heterogeneous, datasets, and data quality control. All projects need to communicate with volunteers and help volunteers talk to each other. They need an attractive user interface, and a way to bring in new blood. \u00a0The conference offers a chance to cross-pollinate, and share ideas, experience, lessons-learned.<\/p>\n It will also be a good chance to talk about the future of the field, and consider support infrastructure.<\/p>\n \u201cWe want to talk about how to formalize as a field so that people can share it, can enter it,\u201d said co-organizer Meg Domroese. \u201cThere\u2019s a need to get beyond unique terminology and jargon. People are scattered across many fields and journals. How can we compare and share processes for collecting and analyzing data?\u201d<\/p>\n Domroese is looking for a permanent shared space, a forum, possibly virtual, where communication can be ongoing. She thinks there is potential for forming a new professional association for training and networking, an online journal, or a central website, independent of the current stakeholders (something like Citizen Science Central, but with expanded capability). There are a lot of options on the table.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n
\n