{"id":8287,"date":"2013-01-11T19:23:08","date_gmt":"2013-01-12T00:23:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/?p=8287"},"modified":"2013-01-11T19:23:08","modified_gmt":"2013-01-12T00:23:08","slug":"a-yellow-perch-in-murky-water","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/2013\/01\/11\/a-yellow-perch-in-murky-water\/","title":{"rendered":"A yellow perch in murky water"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Big fish, little fish, hump-shaped foraging curves, and the landscape of fear.<\/h3>\n<p><em>by Liza Lester, ESA communications officer<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/big-fish-little-fish-zooplankton.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-8288 img-fluid\" title=\"big fish little fish zooplankton\" src=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/big-fish-little-fish-zooplankton.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"398\" srcset=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/big-fish-little-fish-zooplankton.jpg 600w, https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/big-fish-little-fish-zooplankton-300x199.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>IN LIFE, much depends on context. The benefits accruing from the pursuit of liberty, lunch, and other forms of happiness, are tempered by the presence of risk. This is as true for small fishes as for anyone.<\/p>\n<p>In Lake Erie, young yellow perch (<em>Perca flavescens<\/em>) forage for the grab-bag category of microscopic, drifting crustaceans and jellyfish known as zooplankton, while dodging \u00a0the predatory menace of larger, fish-eating fish (and in these northern, temperate waters, adult yellow perch are among the deadly threats to be avoided! In aquarium tests, a single adult yellow perch could eat 100 newly hatched yellow perchlings in less than 2 minutes. More on this later.).<\/p>\n<p>Big fish\u00a0\u2013 top predators in this situation\u00a0\u2013 indirectly influence the abundance of zooplankton by eating down the numbers of \u201cplanktivores.\u201d\u00a0 Young perchlings that escape consumption are further slowed in their own foraging by the necessity of avoiding death \u2013 and thus the zooplankton are twice spared. This tiered arrangement of consumption and influence is well known to aquatic ecologists, and repeats itself with other fishes, in ponds and lakes the world over.<\/p>\n<p>The big fish \u2013 little fish \u2013 zooplankton relationship is buffered by the presence of murky sediments suspended in, and therefore obscuring, the watery world. Murk limits the senses of the fish. Both big and little fish hunt primarily by sight, but big fish hunting smaller fish prey are more quickly hampered by the obscuring murk than little fish looking for zooplankton.<\/p>\n<p>In a mid-December paper for<em> <a title=\"Context-dependent planktivory: interacting effects of turbidity and predation risk on adaptive foraging. 17 Dec 2012.\" href=\"http:\/\/www.esajournals.org\/doi\/full\/10.1890\/ES12-00224.1\">Ecosphere<\/a><\/em>, Kevin Pangle and colleagues argue that zooplankton-eating little fish take advantage of the murky water, changing their behavior. Freed (to varying degrees) from the fear of becoming a meal for a bigger fish, the yellow perchlings pursue zooplankton with a more aggressive focus. The little fish know that the big fish are still around, out there in the murk; they can smell the danger that they can\u2019t see. (Remember the 2-minute aquarium massacre? After 24 hrs, water from the tank in which this carnage occurred still contains chemical evidence detectable by other yellow perchlings \u2013 the smell of deadly menace, presumably, also known as a \u201cpredator cue.\u201d The hatchery-bred perchlings have not encountered predators before; their avoidance behavior comes pre-programed.)<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_8292\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/humpshaped-curve-pangle-et-al-fig-2.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-8292\" class=\" wp-image-8292  img-fluid\" title=\"Hump-shaped: zooplankton in the gut of yellow perch hatchlings as a function of lake depth (inversely proportional to murkiness). From Figure 2 of Pangle et al. (A) yellow perch in Lake Erie, (B) white and black crappie in Ohio reservoirs, and (C) bluegill in Alabama ponds.\" src=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog-preprod\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/humpshaped-curve-pangle-et-al-fig-2.jpeg\" alt=\"Hump-shaped: zooplankton in the gut of yellow perch hatchlings as a function of lake depth (inversely proportional to murkiness). From Figure 2 of Pangle et al. (A) yellow perch in Lake Erie, (B) white and black crappie in Ohio reservoirs, and (C) bluegill in Alabama ponds.\" width=\"600\" height=\"1223\" srcset=\"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/humpshaped-curve-pangle-et-al-fig-2.jpeg 897w, https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/humpshaped-curve-pangle-et-al-fig-2-147x300.jpeg 147w, https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/humpshaped-curve-pangle-et-al-fig-2-502x1024.jpeg 502w, https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/humpshaped-curve-pangle-et-al-fig-2-768x1565.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/humpshaped-curve-pangle-et-al-fig-2-754x1536.jpeg 754w, https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/90\/2013\/01\/humpshaped-curve-pangle-et-al-fig-2-300x611.jpeg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-8292\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Hump-shaped: zooplankton in the gut of yellow perch hatchlings as a function of lake depth (inversely proportional to murkiness). From Figure 2 of Pangle et al. (A) yellow perch in Lake Erie, (B) white and black crappie in Ohio reservoirs, and (C) bluegill in Alabama ponds.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Past a certain point of murkiness, the inconvenience of the gloom begins to overwhelm its benefit for the little fish, the middle link in the chain of consumption. The little fish have trouble seeing their own zooplankton prey, and their foraging success (as measured by stomach contents) drops back down. This combination of factors predicts a \u201chump-shaped\u201d curve of murkiness to zooplankton consumption (\u201chump-shaped\u201d turns out to be charmingly explicit ecological dialect for \u201cunimodal\u201d). In the absence of big fish predators (or a bad smell of predators), increasing murkiness only obscures the zooplankton, predicting a flat, declining trend of zooplankton consumption as murk density grows.<\/p>\n<p>The authors tested their prediction in lab experiments and wild observations. The predictions held up for yellow perch in the lab aquaria and Lake Erie, and for bluegill sunfish in Alabama ponds and black and white crappie in Ohio reservoirs \u2013 ecosystems of different size, character, and food-web composition. This information will be useful, the authors say, for other modelers, who usually assume murkiness only impedes the foraging progress of the planktivores, and perhaps for understanding the fickle, fretful survival of fish hatchlings in the wild.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><span style=\"float: left;padding: 5px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: 0\" src=\"http:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\/public\/citation_icons\/rb2_large_gray.png\" alt=\"ResearchBlogging.org\" class=\"img-fluid\"><\/a><\/span><span class=\"Z3988\" title=\"ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.jtitle=Ecosphere&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1890%2FES12-00224.1&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fresearchblogging.org&amp;rft.atitle=Context-dependent+planktivory%3A+interacting+effects+of+turbidity+and+predation+risk+on+adaptive+foraging&amp;rft.issn=2150-8925&amp;rft.date=2012&amp;rft.volume=3&amp;rft.issue=12&amp;rft.spage=0&amp;rft.epage=&amp;rft.artnum=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.esajournals.org%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1890%2FES12-00224.1&amp;rft.au=Pangle%2C+K.&amp;rft.au=Malinich%2C+T.&amp;rft.au=Bunnell%2C+D.&amp;rft.au=DeVries%2C+D.&amp;rft.au=Ludsin%2C+S.&amp;rfe_dat=bpr3.included=1;bpr3.tags=Biology%2CEcology+%2F+Conservation\">Pangle, K., Malinich, T., Bunnell, D., DeVries, D., &amp; Ludsin, S. (2012). Context-dependent planktivory: interacting effects of turbidity and predation risk on adaptive foraging <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Ecosphere, 3<\/span> (12) DOI: <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1890\/ES12-00224.1\" rev=\"review\">10.1890\/ES12-00224.1<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Big fish, little fish, hump-shaped foraging curves, and the landscape of fear. by Liza Lester, ESA communications officer IN LIFE, much depends on context. The benefits accruing from the pursuit of liberty, lunch, and other forms of happiness, are tempered by the presence of risk. This is as true for small fishes as for anyone. In Lake Erie, young yellow&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1346,1498,1499,17,1500,1501,1502],"class_list":["post-8287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research","tag-aquatic-ecology","tag-behavioral-plasticity","tag-ecosphere","tag-fish","tag-limnology","tag-tropic-cascades","tag-zooplankton"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/36"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8287\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/esa.org\/esablog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}