99th ESA Annual Meeting
August 10 – 15, 2014
Deadline: 5:00 PM Eastern
Thursday, September 26, 2013
- About Symposia
- Evaluation Process and Criteria
- If Your Proposal Is Accepted
- Important Dates
- To Submit
We invite proposals for symposia for the 99th ESA Annual Meeting. The meeting will be held August 10 – 15, 2014 in Sacramento, California at the Sacramento Convention Center.
Symposia are the scientific centerpiece of the meeting. They will be assigned premium meeting space at the Sacramento Convention Center and will serve as the cornerstone for assembly of the scientific program. Proposals addressing the meeting theme, “From Oceans to Mountains: It’s All Ecology” are especially welcome, but any timely and coherent subject of broad interest will be considered. We also welcome proposals that explore interdisciplinary connections with areas of social and natural science outside of ecology or that relate to ecological education at any level.
This meeting will include 24 symposia. Symposia are limited to half-day sessions (3.5 hours). Full-day symposia will not be considered. Collaborating organizers may propose two Symposia to address different aspects of a shared topic as long as the lead organizers are different for each session. Each symposium will consist of 6 talks, each 30 minutes in length, followed by a 20 minute period devoted to synthesis, summary, and discussion. Proposals listing more or fewer than 6 speakers will not be considered.
Proposals must be received through the online submission form by 5:00 PM Eastern Time on Thursday, September 26, 2013. Any proposals sent by email or after the deadline will not be considered.
Evaluation Process and Criteria
All proposals will be peer-reviewed and ranked by reviewers selected by the ESA Program Chair. The Program Chair may accept or decline your proposal, or offer you the opportunity to present your work in an alternative forum (organized oral session, workshop, or special session) during the Annual Meeting.
Decisions and alternative offers will be made by December 12, 2013.
Symposium proposals will be assessed using the following criteria. Weighting of particular criteria may vary depending on the nature of proposals, but proposals should explicitly address these criteria, as appropriate.
Scientific strength: Symposia are the scientific centerpieces of the meeting, and should:
- offer significant contributions to ecological understanding
- present innovative or interdisciplinary approaches, including novel collaborations or syntheses across subdisciplines of ecology or with other related disciplines
- provide examples of how ecological research benefited from attention to public policy concerns, outreach or educational activities
- have broad enough appeal to generate large audiences (>250 people) at the meeting
Structure and organization: Symposia should be more explicitly integrated than other sessions, and should be structured to:
- provide overall synthesis or overview; they should not be simply a set of related case studies
- avoid taking a narrow perspective on the symposium topic; organizers should carefully avoid the appearance of biases toward their own perspectives
- build a well-integrated whole; each talk should have clear relevance to the overall synthesis provided by the symposium
Integration: Proposals may receive higher priority if they are clearly linked to the meeting’s overall theme, or if they offer particular value or insight in the context of other sessions proposed for this meeting or of symposia at recent ESA meetings.
Speakers: Invited speakers may be a mix of well-established scientists, rising stars, and newcomers, but each speaker should bring new contributions to the session, not simply reviews of previous work. Inclusion of experienced or particularly engaging speakers can strengthen a proposal, but new voices are also important. Proposals with a larger proportion of confirmed speakers among the 6 listed will be favored.
All speakers will be required to submit an abstract by the February 27, 2014 abstract submission deadline. The Symposium organizer is responsible for ensuring that all abstracts are received by this date.
Endorsements: The Program Committee has eliminated endorsements as of 2013.
Session and presentation rules: In the interest of broadening participation, an individual is allowed to be an organizer (either a principal organizer or a co-organizer) for only one organized session (symposium, organized oral, organized poster).
An organizer of a symposium may serve as its moderator OR speak in that symposium. The moderator for a symposium may not serve as a speaker in that symposium. The moderator may, however, be a speaker in another session.
Speakers agreeing to present papers in symposia also should be aware that the one presentation rule will be enforced. That is, anyone who is first author or presenter of a symposium paper cannot also be first author or presenter for another paper whether for a symposium, organized oral session, contributed oral session, or poster session. Organizers should make certain that speakers they recruit understand this rule and make no conflicting commitments. The one-paper rule does not apply to participants speaking in special sessions or workshops, or to plenary speakers.
There is an exemption to the one presentation rule for an author submitting an abstract for a second presentation IF the second abstract is directly related to ecology education, scientific outreach, or the history of ecology or ESA.
If Your Proposal Is Accepted
After symposia are accepted and the scheduling for the meeting is underway, cancellations and schedule changes are very disruptive to meeting planning. Hence, symposium organizers should obtain firm commitments from as many of their invited speakers as possible before submitting their proposal.
If a proposal is accepted, the organizer(s) must submit a final summary description and confirmed speaker list for the symposium to the Program Coordinator in January. This summary will appear on the meeting website and should be written so as to stimulate interest and promote attendance by a general audience, and thus is different in focus from the description in the original proposal. This final summary must include a complete and current listing of organizers’ names and their affiliations, addresses, telephone and fax numbers, and email addresses; a 250 word description of the session; a single-sentence (up to 50 words) description of the session; and a final, confirmed speaker list.
Organizers will be informed of their session’s time and date in February. Symposia may be scheduled for any oral session timeslot between Monday afternoon and Friday morning. The program committee will attempt to avoid any overt conflicts between sessions and will give organizers an opportunity to notify us of known scheduling conflicts; however, we are unable to honor special scheduling requests. Organizers should inform their invited speakers that scheduling on any day of the conference is possible when asking speakers to commit to the session. We cannot schedule or move a session to accommodate the availability of speakers.
It is the responsibility of the symposium organizers to see that each speaker submits an individual abstract of his/her talk through the Abstract Submission site by the February 27 deadline. Speakers who fail to submit an abstract on time will be removed from the session.
Communication With Speakers
If a proposal is accepted as a session, it is very important that the organizer communicates with speakers between December and August about the acceptance status of the session, the confirmation status of speakers, abstract requirements and deadlines, session scheduling information, and expectations for participation in the conference. It is ultimately the organizer’s responsibility to make sure all of the abstracts for the session are received by the abstract deadline.
Please note that ESA is not able to provide any financial assistance, stipends, free or reduced registration, travel assistance, or paid lodging to symposium organizers or to individual symposium participants. All speakers are required to register for the conference. Organizers are responsible for making this clear to their speakers.
The deadline for cancellation without risk of penalty is May 1. Instructions for how to cancel are included in all notification emails sent to presenters. You should reply to any of those emails to cancel. For cancellations after May 1, please read the following section.
Late Cancellations And No Shows
Late cancellations and failures to give scheduled presentations (no shows) are disruptive and leave gaps in the program that are a source of frustration for attendees. Therefore, ESA has adopted the following policies for avoidable situations which result in gaps in the meeting program. These penalties are not applied to presenters with understandable and unavoidable reasons for not attending the conference (medical issues, family emergencies, unforeseen travel problems, and similar situations outside of a presenter’s control). Late cancellations due to a presenter’s inability to secure funding to attend are considered avoidable. The purpose of the penalties is to deter avoidable cancellations by encouraging presenters with a great deal of uncertainty regarding their attendance to cancel before scheduling begins in May. Presenters in uncertain funding situations should cancel by May 1 or be prepared to pay the penalty.
- What is a late cancellation? A cancellation occurring after May 1, with an exemption for medical and family situations as well as difficulty acquiring a visa to travel to the US.
- The late cancellation fee is $50 USD regardless of presentation type (posters and talks). It applies only to the presenting author, not to any coauthors.
- Please do not submit an abstract “just in case.” Before submitting an abstract, authors should be reasonably confident that they will attend the meeting and make the presentation as scheduled. If there is uncertainty then please confirm your plans or cancel before May 1.
- A replacement speaker is allowed if your plans change close to the conference dates. If circumstances prevent attendance for a scheduled presentation, the presenting author should attempt to find another person to make the presentation on their behalf. A coauthor is ideal, but the substitute speaker does not necessarily need to be a coauthor. If you have arranged for a replacement speaker after May 15, you do not need to notify ESA because we cannot update the program. However, please notify session organizers if applicable.
- If cancellation is unavoidable, the author should notify ESA as soon as possible. Please let us know if you will not be able to present, even if you are cancelling on a date close to or during the Annual Meeting.
- ESA is willing to consider waiving the penalty for a presenter who has a compelling reason to cancel late. If you are cancelling after May 1 and would like us to consider waiving the applicable penalties, please include a brief reason for the cancellation when you contact us.
- What is a no show? A no show is when a presentation was not made as scheduled and the presenter did not notify ESA of their inability to present.
- We realize that sometimes events outside of a presenter’s control prevent them from presenting as scheduled. For example, a flight cancellation or an unforeseen medical condition or family emergency. And sometimes these problems cannot be communicated to ESA staff until after the scheduled presentation time has passed. We will be lenient for such situations if we receive some sort of explanation from the presenter, even if the message is sent after the presentation would have occurred.
- A presenter in such a situation should reply to any of the notification emails sent to presenters. Messages and notes passed in person on the meeting site are highly unreliable! Email is by far the best method for letting us know what has happened. We may not be able to respond during the conference but we will save all such messages for processing after the conference.
- For other cases, where there is not a compelling reason and no notice was received, the no show penalty will be enforced.
- The no show penalty is a one year presentation ban, regardless of presentation type (posters and talks). Any abstract with the penalized author listed as the presenting author will not be accepted for the following year’s conference. This penalty applies only to the presenting author, not to any coauthors. The presenting author can still organize a session, be listed as a coauthor, and attend the conference. The ban is for presenting a formal talk or poster only.
|September 26, 2013||Deadline for submitting a proposal to ESA.|
|December 12, 2013||Notification of acceptance sent to organizer.|
|January 14, 2014||Deadline to submit session revisions and confirmed speaker lists.|
|February 13, 2014||Notification of scheduling (session date and time) sent to organizer.|
|February 27, 2014||Deadline for speakers to submit abstracts.|
All proposals MUST follow the format of the online submission form on the ESA meeting website. Incomplete or inaccurate information may result in the proposal not being considered.
Note that the following information must be entered into the online submission form. It is provided here to assist you in planning your submission in advance. Also note that the web page format may differ slightly from the format listed here.All proposals must include:
- Title of symposium
- Principal organizer (Name, institution or affiliation, email) Note that this person is the point of contact for the session.
- Co-organizers (Names, institutions or affiliations, email). Indicate which of the organizers will serve as moderator. The moderator may not serve as a speaker in the symposium.
- 6 Speakers (Names, affiliations, emails, and tentative titles or topic areas). No more or less than 6 speakers should be listed. Indicate which speakers are confirmed and which are tentative.
- Description (< 400 words) and justification (< 250 words) of the symposium: Background information, goals, objectives, importance, and interest to the membership of ESA. The description should focus on the theme and structure of the session (including anticipated sequence of speakers and topics), while the justification should focus on how the review criteria are met by the proposal and should not simply repeat the description. Keep the evaluation criteria in mind while preparing your description and justification.
When you submit your proposal on the website submission form, you will be automatically notified of receipt by an email sent to the address that you provide. If you do not receive such a notification, please contact Program Coordinator Jennifer Riem at email@example.com to confirm that your proposal was received. Organizers of accepted proposals will be notified in February regarding the date and time for their sessions at the Annual Meeting. Organizers are responsible for notifying all participants in their symposium of the date, time, and place of the session.
Dr. Hal Balbach
US Army Corps of Engineers
PO Box 9005 Champaign, IL 61826-9005
Ecological Society of America
1990 M Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036 USA
Phone: (202) 833-8773 x 218